From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jaeyong Yoo <jaeyong.yoo@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/4] Implement arch_hvm_save and
 arch_hvm_load functions
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 10:46:51 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <24280375.35201370429210845.JavaMail.weblogic@epv6ml01>
Reply-To: jaeyong.yoo@samsung.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
MIME-version: 1.0
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

> > I think if we use all of them for safety check, it is sufficient.
> > 
> > (Maybe it is too much?)
> 
> Perhaps we should leave this to one side for now and revisit once we
> have a working save/restore and understand the constraints upon it a bit
> better?

Sure, of course.

Jaeyong