xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexey Tumanov <atumanov@gmail.com>
To: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: time freeze on save/restore, x86_64
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 19:32:28 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2453e2901002101632k78f36f69m3883c739556424f0@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ac25472d-7297-4aa8-a15c-818f6a3ec653@default>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3403 bytes --]

we're maintaining a patch queue on top of this specific c/set, and rebasing
the patch queue carries engineering overhead and testing. But if there's a
small number of changesets that fixes the problem, perhaps we could backport
them?

Alex.

On 10 February 2010 19:22, Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>wrote:

> > Is behaviour different if you put a line 'tsc_mode=2' in your domain
> > config file as passed to 'xm create'?
>
> Keir --
>
> C/s 19603 I think predates all of the tsc work, though the problem
> might be related to timer_mode.
>
> Alexey --
>
> Why such an old changeset?  There's been a LOT of work on time since then.
> If you are using a released product by a vendor with this changeset,
> you might want to check with that vendor.  If not, and you aren't
> able to update to a newer Xen, or if you update and it doesn't
> fix the problem, please reply again.
>
> Dan
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Keir Fraser [mailto:keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 5:09 PM
> > To: Alexey Tumanov; xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] time freeze on save/restore, x86_64
> >
> > Is behaviour different if you put a line 'tsc_mode=2' in your domain
> > config
> > file as passed to 'xm create'?
> >
> >  -- Keir
> >
> > On 10/02/2010 23:51, "Alexey Tumanov" <atumanov@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm running xen-unstable c/s 19603 with a single 2.6.18.8-xen kernel
> > image
> > > used for both dom0 and domUs. I'm experiencing a time freeze when I
> > restore a
> > > domU checkpoint file on another physical host. Basically, both date
> > (referring
> > > to /etc/localtime) and gettimeofday() (issuing a gettimeofday
> > syscall)
> > > repeatedly report unchanging values for tens of seconds:
> > > debian:/var/tmp# ./timer
> > > time: sec=1265844232, usec=728054
> > > debian:/var/tmp# ./timer
> > > time: sec=1265844232, usec=728054
> > > debian:/var/tmp# ./timer
> > > time: sec=1265844232, usec=728054
> > > debian:/var/tmp# date
> > > Wed Feb 10 23:23:52 UTC 2010
> > > debian:/var/tmp# date
> > > Wed Feb 10 23:23:52 UTC 2010
> > > debian:/var/tmp# date
> > > Wed Feb 10 23:23:52 UTC 2010
> > >
> > > The timer (TSC??) springs back to life after 20-30 seconds.
> > > Hardware: Sun Fire X2250, 2 socket, quad-core = total of 8 execution
> > threads.
> > > Processor: Intel Xeon E5472 @ 3GHz
> > > Arch: x86_64
> > >
> > > I've seen some discussion about TSC skew, and tried setting
> > clocksource to
> > > acpi instead of the default hpet - didn't help. I also tried echoing
> > "1" to
> > > /proc/sys/xen/independent_wallclock to no avail. Finally, no luck
> > debugging
> > > with xen gdb, because setting a breakpoint in do_gettimeofday is
> > futile - it
> > > fires non-stop.
> > >
> > > Does anybody have any suggestions? In my case, it is not just a TSC
> > skew - the
> > > clock stalls for quite an extended period of time, while the restored
> > VM is
> > > otherwise operational and responds to all sorts of commands unless
> > they
> > > execute anything that translates into a nanosleep syscall. The
> > latter, of
> > > course, won't return until the clock starts going again.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Alex.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-devel mailing list
> > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 4726 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 138 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

      reply	other threads:[~2010-02-11  0:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-10 23:51 time freeze on save/restore, x86_64 Alexey Tumanov
2010-02-11  0:09 ` Keir Fraser
2010-02-11  0:20   ` Alexey Tumanov
2010-02-11  0:32     ` Keir Fraser
2010-02-11  0:22   ` Dan Magenheimer
2010-02-11  0:32     ` Alexey Tumanov [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2453e2901002101632k78f36f69m3883c739556424f0@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=atumanov@gmail.com \
    --cc=dan.magenheimer@oracle.com \
    --cc=keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).