* linux-arm-xen branch, commit access, etc.
@ 2017-10-20 14:34 Ian Jackson
2017-10-20 15:56 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Ian Jackson @ 2017-10-20 14:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefano Stabellini, Lars Kurth, xen-devel, committers,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk, Roger Pau Monné, Boris Ostrovsky,
Juergen Gross, Wei Liu, Paul Durrant
Currently we are running our ARM tests in osstest off a branch in
Stefano's personal Linux tree. This is a bit unsatisfactory.
We would like to switch to a branch that Julien can push to too, and
that is in a more official place.
There are two options:
1. Create an ARM-specific Xen tree. Currently we don't have many
ARM-specific trees but I don't see a problem with this. So
we could create
/arm/linux.git
on xenbits.
2. Use a branch name within /linux-pvops.git, the main Linux
tree on xenbits. This would mean making Julien a committer.
What do people think would be best ?
Also, separately, surely Julien should be listed in MAINTAINERS for
the Xen ARM stuff in upstream Linux ? He doesn't seem to be at least
in the version I have lying about here...
Thanks,
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* Re: linux-arm-xen branch, commit access, etc. 2017-10-20 14:34 linux-arm-xen branch, commit access, etc Ian Jackson @ 2017-10-20 15:56 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2017-10-20 17:17 ` Stefano Stabellini 0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk @ 2017-10-20 15:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ian Jackson Cc: Juergen Gross, Lars Kurth, Stefano Stabellini, Wei Liu, Paul Durrant, committers, xen-devel, Boris Ostrovsky, Roger Pau Monné On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 03:34:40PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Currently we are running our ARM tests in osstest off a branch in > Stefano's personal Linux tree. This is a bit unsatisfactory. > > We would like to switch to a branch that Julien can push to too, and > that is in a more official place. > > There are two options: > > 1. Create an ARM-specific Xen tree. Currently we don't have many > ARM-specific trees but I don't see a problem with this. So > we could create > /arm/linux.git > on xenbits. > > 2. Use a branch name within /linux-pvops.git, the main Linux > tree on xenbits. This would mean making Julien a committer. 3. Use upstream released kernels. Follow them when they are released. > > What do people think would be best ? > > Also, separately, surely Julien should be listed in MAINTAINERS for > the Xen ARM stuff in upstream Linux ? He doesn't seem to be at least > in the version I have lying about here... > > Thanks, > Ian. > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xen.org > https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-arm-xen branch, commit access, etc. 2017-10-20 15:56 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk @ 2017-10-20 17:17 ` Stefano Stabellini 2017-10-20 17:45 ` Ian Jackson 0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: Stefano Stabellini @ 2017-10-20 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: Juergen Gross, Lars Kurth, Stefano Stabellini, Wei Liu, Ian Jackson, Paul Durrant, committers, xen-devel, Boris Ostrovsky, Roger Pau Monné On Fri, 20 Oct 2017, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 03:34:40PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > Currently we are running our ARM tests in osstest off a branch in > > Stefano's personal Linux tree. This is a bit unsatisfactory. > > > > We would like to switch to a branch that Julien can push to too, and > > that is in a more official place. > > > > There are two options: > > > > 1. Create an ARM-specific Xen tree. Currently we don't have many > > ARM-specific trees but I don't see a problem with this. So > > we could create > > /arm/linux.git > > on xenbits. > > > > 2. Use a branch name within /linux-pvops.git, the main Linux > > tree on xenbits. This would mean making Julien a committer. > > 3. Use upstream released kernels. Follow them when they are released. I agree with Konrad. The reason why that branch is there is that initially we needed a couple of patches to run Linux on Exynos5 boards (Arndale). Today, vanilla releases should work. For example, 4.13 has everything we need as far as I can tell. I think it is time to remove the special branch. If it turns out that we still need a special branch (I don't think we do), then 1. is a good option. > > What do people think would be best ? > > > > Also, separately, surely Julien should be listed in MAINTAINERS for > > the Xen ARM stuff in upstream Linux ? He doesn't seem to be at least > > in the version I have lying about here... No, that is correct, at the moment I am the only maintainer for Xen on ARM support in Linux. I'll talk to Julien but the attention it requires is very limited. Patches specific to arch/arm/xen and arch/arm64/xen/ are very few, in the order of 10 in the last year. It doesn't necessarily need more than one maintainer. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-arm-xen branch, commit access, etc. 2017-10-20 17:17 ` Stefano Stabellini @ 2017-10-20 17:45 ` Ian Jackson 2017-10-20 18:04 ` Stefano Stabellini 0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: Ian Jackson @ 2017-10-20 17:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stefano Stabellini Cc: Juergen Gross, Lars Kurth, Wei Liu, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk, Paul Durrant, committers, xen-devel, Boris Ostrovsky, Roger Pau Monné Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] linux-arm-xen branch, commit access, etc."): > On Fri, 20 Oct 2017, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > 3. Use upstream released kernels. Follow them when they are released. > > I agree with Konrad. The reason why that branch is there is that > initially we needed a couple of patches to run Linux on Exynos5 boards > (Arndale). Today, vanilla releases should work. For example, 4.13 has > everything we need as far as I can tell. I think it is time to remove > the special branch. So vanilla kernels are going to work well on our new ARM64 boxes, eg ThunderX, and whatever we come up with for new ARM32 testing too ? In. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-arm-xen branch, commit access, etc. 2017-10-20 17:45 ` Ian Jackson @ 2017-10-20 18:04 ` Stefano Stabellini 2017-10-20 19:10 ` Julien Grall 0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: Stefano Stabellini @ 2017-10-20 18:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ian Jackson Cc: Juergen Gross, Lars Kurth, Stefano Stabellini, Wei Liu, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk, julien.grall, Paul Durrant, committers, xen-devel, Boris Ostrovsky, Roger Pau Monné CC'ing Julien On Fri, 20 Oct 2017, Ian Jackson wrote: > Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] linux-arm-xen branch, commit access, etc."): > > On Fri, 20 Oct 2017, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > > 3. Use upstream released kernels. Follow them when they are released. > > > > I agree with Konrad. The reason why that branch is there is that > > initially we needed a couple of patches to run Linux on Exynos5 boards > > (Arndale). Today, vanilla releases should work. For example, 4.13 has > > everything we need as far as I can tell. I think it is time to remove > > the special branch. > > So vanilla kernels are going to work well on our new ARM64 boxes, eg > ThunderX, and whatever we come up with for new ARM32 testing too ? I think so: ThunderX and other server platforms should be more "standard" than small embedded boards. But if we decide to buy some small and cheap ARM32 boards, such as Linaro HiKey, they tend to still require special kernel trees. In other words: I think we should be able to get rid of the special tree for the hardware that we have today, but I cannot guarantee that we won't ever need it in the future. Julien, do you think we need to keep a special linux tree around for Xen on ARM testing in OSSTest or we can start using vanilla kernel releases? I would love to get rid of it, if you know of any reasons why we have to keep it, this is the time to speak :-) _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-arm-xen branch, commit access, etc. 2017-10-20 18:04 ` Stefano Stabellini @ 2017-10-20 19:10 ` Julien Grall 2017-10-23 21:33 ` Stefano Stabellini 0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: Julien Grall @ 2017-10-20 19:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stefano Stabellini Cc: Juergen Gross, Lars Kurth, Wei Liu, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk, Ian Jackson, julien.grall, Paul Durrant, committers, xen-devel, Boris Ostrovsky, Roger Pau Monné [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1829 bytes --] Hi, Sorry for the formatting. On 20 Oct 2017 19:06, "Stefano Stabellini" <sstabellini@kernel.org> wrote: CC'ing Julien On Fri, 20 Oct 2017, Ian Jackson wrote: > Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] linux-arm-xen branch, commit access, etc."): > > On Fri, 20 Oct 2017, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > > 3. Use upstream released kernels. Follow them when they are released. > > > > I agree with Konrad. The reason why that branch is there is that > > initially we needed a couple of patches to run Linux on Exynos5 boards > > (Arndale). Today, vanilla releases should work. For example, 4.13 has > > everything we need as far as I can tell. I think it is time to remove > > the special branch. > > So vanilla kernels are going to work well on our new ARM64 boxes, eg > ThunderX, and whatever we come up with for new ARM32 testing too ? I think so: ThunderX and other server platforms should be more "standard" than small embedded boards. But if we decide to buy some small and cheap ARM32 boards, such as Linaro HiKey, they tend to still require special kernel trees. It is what you wish :). For instance Thunder-X support has been fully made upstream (ACPI + DT) only recently. In other words: I think we should be able to get rid of the special tree for the hardware that we have today, but I cannot guarantee that we won't ever need it in the future. IIRC we are going to get some renesas board recently. Do you know if upstream will work? Julien, do you think we need to keep a special linux tree around for Xen on ARM testing in OSSTest or we can start using vanilla kernel releases? I would love to get rid of it, if you know of any reasons why we have to keep it, this is the time to speak :-) I think it would be better to keep aroundSome platform may be available before the code is merged. Cheers, [-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3100 bytes --] [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 127 bytes --] _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-arm-xen branch, commit access, etc. 2017-10-20 19:10 ` Julien Grall @ 2017-10-23 21:33 ` Stefano Stabellini 2017-11-02 13:34 ` Julien Grall 2017-12-05 17:42 ` Ian Jackson 0 siblings, 2 replies; 17+ messages in thread From: Stefano Stabellini @ 2017-10-23 21:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Julien Grall Cc: Juergen Gross, Lars Kurth, Stefano Stabellini, Wei Liu, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk, Ian Jackson, julien.grall, Paul Durrant, committers, xen-devel, Boris Ostrovsky, Roger Pau Monné On Fri, 20 Oct 2017, Julien Grall wrote: > Julien, do you think we need to keep a special linux tree around for Xen > on ARM testing in OSSTest or we can start using vanilla kernel releases? > I would love to get rid of it, if you know of any reasons why we have to > keep it, this is the time to speak :-) > > > I think it would be better to keep aroundSome platform may be available before the code is merged. Sure. Ian, let's create a /arm/linux.git tree on xenbits where both Julien and I can push. The idea is that we'll try to use vanilla kernel releases but we'll keep it around just in case we'll need special patches for hardware support in the future. If it turns out that we don't actually need it, we can get rid of it in a year or two. We'll initialize /arm/linux.git based on the current linux-arm-xen branch. /arm/linux.git will replace linux-arm-xen in OSSTest. Sounds good? Thanks, Stefano _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-arm-xen branch, commit access, etc. 2017-10-23 21:33 ` Stefano Stabellini @ 2017-11-02 13:34 ` Julien Grall 2017-12-05 15:46 ` Julien Grall 2017-12-05 17:42 ` Ian Jackson 1 sibling, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: Julien Grall @ 2017-11-02 13:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stefano Stabellini Cc: Juergen Gross, Lars Kurth, Wei Liu, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk, Ian Jackson, julien.grall, Paul Durrant, committers, xen-devel, Boris Ostrovsky, Roger Pau Monné Hi, On 23/10/17 22:33, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Fri, 20 Oct 2017, Julien Grall wrote: >> Julien, do you think we need to keep a special linux tree around for Xen >> on ARM testing in OSSTest or we can start using vanilla kernel releases? >> I would love to get rid of it, if you know of any reasons why we have to >> keep it, this is the time to speak :-) >> >> >> I think it would be better to keep aroundSome platform may be available before the code is merged. > > Sure. > > > Ian, > > let's create a /arm/linux.git tree on xenbits where both Julien and I > can push. The idea is that we'll try to use vanilla kernel releases but > we'll keep it around just in case we'll need special patches for > hardware support in the future. If it turns out that we don't actually > need it, we can get rid of it in a year or two. > > We'll initialize /arm/linux.git based on the current linux-arm-xen > branch. /arm/linux.git will replace linux-arm-xen in OSSTest. > > Sounds good? I don't mind as long as I have access to the arm linux tree. Ian do you have any opinions? Cheers, -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-arm-xen branch, commit access, etc. 2017-11-02 13:34 ` Julien Grall @ 2017-12-05 15:46 ` Julien Grall 0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread From: Julien Grall @ 2017-12-05 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stefano Stabellini Cc: Juergen Gross, Lars Kurth, Wei Liu, Ian Jackson, julien.grall, Paul Durrant, committers, xen-devel, Boris Ostrovsky, Roger Pau Monné Hi, Ping? This is going to be very helpful for bringing up osstest on Thunder-X. Cheers, On 02/11/17 13:34, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi, > > On 23/10/17 22:33, Stefano Stabellini wrote: >> On Fri, 20 Oct 2017, Julien Grall wrote: >>> Julien, do you think we need to keep a special linux tree >>> around for Xen >>> on ARM testing in OSSTest or we can start using vanilla kernel >>> releases? >>> I would love to get rid of it, if you know of any reasons why >>> we have to >>> keep it, this is the time to speak :-) >>> >>> >>> I think it would be better to keep aroundSome platform may be >>> available before the code is merged. >> >> Sure. >> >> >> Ian, >> >> let's create a /arm/linux.git tree on xenbits where both Julien and I >> can push. The idea is that we'll try to use vanilla kernel releases but >> we'll keep it around just in case we'll need special patches for >> hardware support in the future. If it turns out that we don't actually >> need it, we can get rid of it in a year or two. >> >> We'll initialize /arm/linux.git based on the current linux-arm-xen >> branch. /arm/linux.git will replace linux-arm-xen in OSSTest. >> >> Sounds good? > > I don't mind as long as I have access to the arm linux tree. Ian do you > have any opinions? > > Cheers, > -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-arm-xen branch, commit access, etc. 2017-10-23 21:33 ` Stefano Stabellini 2017-11-02 13:34 ` Julien Grall @ 2017-12-05 17:42 ` Ian Jackson 2017-12-05 17:57 ` Julien Grall 1 sibling, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: Ian Jackson @ 2017-12-05 17:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stefano Stabellini Cc: Juergen Gross, Lars Kurth, Wei Liu, Julien Grall, julien.grall, Paul Durrant, committers, xen-devel, Boris Ostrovsky, Roger Pau Monné Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] linux-arm-xen branch, commit access, etc."): > let's create a /arm/linux.git tree on xenbits where both Julien and I > can push. The idea is that we'll try to use vanilla kernel releases but > we'll keep it around just in case we'll need special patches for > hardware support in the future. If it turns out that we don't actually > need it, we can get rid of it in a year or two. No-one objected to this, so I have done it. There's a bare repo there. > We'll initialize /arm/linux.git based on the current linux-arm-xen > branch. /arm/linux.git will replace linux-arm-xen in OSSTest. Let me know when you've populated it and I'll change osstest. Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-arm-xen branch, commit access, etc. 2017-12-05 17:42 ` Ian Jackson @ 2017-12-05 17:57 ` Julien Grall 2017-12-05 18:28 ` [OSSTEST PATCH] linux-arm-xen: Get from shared arm/linux.git xenbits tree Ian Jackson 0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: Julien Grall @ 2017-12-05 17:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ian Jackson, Stefano Stabellini Cc: Juergen Gross, Lars Kurth, Wei Liu, julien.grall, Paul Durrant, committers, xen-devel, Boris Ostrovsky, Roger Pau Monné Hi Ian, On 05/12/17 17:42, Ian Jackson wrote: > Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] linux-arm-xen branch, commit access, etc."): >> let's create a /arm/linux.git tree on xenbits where both Julien and I >> can push. The idea is that we'll try to use vanilla kernel releases but >> we'll keep it around just in case we'll need special patches for >> hardware support in the future. If it turns out that we don't actually >> need it, we can get rid of it in a year or two. > > No-one objected to this, so I have done it. There's a bare repo > there. Thank you! > >> We'll initialize /arm/linux.git based on the current linux-arm-xen >> branch. /arm/linux.git will replace linux-arm-xen in OSSTest. > > Let me know when you've populated it and I'll change osstest. The tree has been populated based on Stefano's tree. Branch linux-arm-xen. Cheers, -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [OSSTEST PATCH] linux-arm-xen: Get from shared arm/linux.git xenbits tree 2017-12-05 17:57 ` Julien Grall @ 2017-12-05 18:28 ` Ian Jackson 2017-12-05 18:30 ` Julien Grall 0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: Ian Jackson @ 2017-12-05 18:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: xen-devel; +Cc: Stefano Stabellini, Ian Jackson, Julien Grall This drops the dependency on Stefano's personal git tree. The osstest output branch remains unmoved. CC: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> CC: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com> --- ap-common | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/ap-common b/ap-common index bc7c03c..4576ac9 100644 --- a/ap-common +++ b/ap-common @@ -100,8 +100,8 @@ info_linux_tree () { : ${TREE_LINUX_THIS:=${KERNEL_SCM}/torvalds/linux-2.6.git} ;; linux-arm-xen) - : ${TREE_LINUX_THIS:=${KERNEL_SCM}/sstabellini/xen.git} - : ${TREE_LINUX_ARM_THIS:=${KERNEL_SCM}/sstabellini/xen.git} + : ${TREE_LINUX_THIS:=git://xenbits.xen.org/arm/linux.git} + : ${TREE_LINUX_ARM_THIS:=git://xenbits.xen.org/arm/linux.git} : ${TAG_LINUX_THIS:=linux-arm-xen} : ${TAG_LINUX_ARM_THIS:=linux-arm-xen} ;; -- 2.1.4 _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [OSSTEST PATCH] linux-arm-xen: Get from shared arm/linux.git xenbits tree 2017-12-05 18:28 ` [OSSTEST PATCH] linux-arm-xen: Get from shared arm/linux.git xenbits tree Ian Jackson @ 2017-12-05 18:30 ` Julien Grall 2017-12-05 18:34 ` Stefano Stabellini 0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: Julien Grall @ 2017-12-05 18:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ian Jackson, xen-devel; +Cc: Stefano Stabellini Hi Ian, On 05/12/17 18:28, Ian Jackson wrote: > This drops the dependency on Stefano's personal git tree. > The osstest output branch remains unmoved. > > CC: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> > CC: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org> > Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com> Acked-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org> Cheers, > --- > ap-common | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/ap-common b/ap-common > index bc7c03c..4576ac9 100644 > --- a/ap-common > +++ b/ap-common > @@ -100,8 +100,8 @@ info_linux_tree () { > : ${TREE_LINUX_THIS:=${KERNEL_SCM}/torvalds/linux-2.6.git} > ;; > linux-arm-xen) > - : ${TREE_LINUX_THIS:=${KERNEL_SCM}/sstabellini/xen.git} > - : ${TREE_LINUX_ARM_THIS:=${KERNEL_SCM}/sstabellini/xen.git} > + : ${TREE_LINUX_THIS:=git://xenbits.xen.org/arm/linux.git} > + : ${TREE_LINUX_ARM_THIS:=git://xenbits.xen.org/arm/linux.git} > : ${TAG_LINUX_THIS:=linux-arm-xen} > : ${TAG_LINUX_ARM_THIS:=linux-arm-xen} > ;; > -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [OSSTEST PATCH] linux-arm-xen: Get from shared arm/linux.git xenbits tree 2017-12-05 18:30 ` Julien Grall @ 2017-12-05 18:34 ` Stefano Stabellini 2017-12-05 18:41 ` Ian Jackson 0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: Stefano Stabellini @ 2017-12-05 18:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Julien Grall; +Cc: xen-devel, Stefano Stabellini, Ian Jackson On Tue, 5 Dec 2017, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi Ian, > > On 05/12/17 18:28, Ian Jackson wrote: > > This drops the dependency on Stefano's personal git tree. > > The osstest output branch remains unmoved. > > > > CC: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> > > CC: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org> > > Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com> > > Acked-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org> Acked-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> > Cheers, > > > --- > > ap-common | 4 ++-- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/ap-common b/ap-common > > index bc7c03c..4576ac9 100644 > > --- a/ap-common > > +++ b/ap-common > > @@ -100,8 +100,8 @@ info_linux_tree () { > > : ${TREE_LINUX_THIS:=${KERNEL_SCM}/torvalds/linux-2.6.git} > > ;; > > linux-arm-xen) > > - : ${TREE_LINUX_THIS:=${KERNEL_SCM}/sstabellini/xen.git} > > - : ${TREE_LINUX_ARM_THIS:=${KERNEL_SCM}/sstabellini/xen.git} > > + : ${TREE_LINUX_THIS:=git://xenbits.xen.org/arm/linux.git} > > + : ${TREE_LINUX_ARM_THIS:=git://xenbits.xen.org/arm/linux.git} > > : ${TAG_LINUX_THIS:=linux-arm-xen} > > : ${TAG_LINUX_ARM_THIS:=linux-arm-xen} > > ;; > > > > -- > Julien Grall > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [OSSTEST PATCH] linux-arm-xen: Get from shared arm/linux.git xenbits tree 2017-12-05 18:34 ` Stefano Stabellini @ 2017-12-05 18:41 ` Ian Jackson 2017-12-05 18:42 ` Julien Grall 0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: Ian Jackson @ 2017-12-05 18:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stefano Stabellini; +Cc: xen-devel, Julien Grall, Ian Jackson Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [OSSTEST PATCH] linux-arm-xen: Get from shared arm/linux.git xenbits tree"): > On Tue, 5 Dec 2017, Julien Grall wrote: > > Acked-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org> > > Acked-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> Thanks. This queued for my next osstest push, which I expect to do some time tomorrow. Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [OSSTEST PATCH] linux-arm-xen: Get from shared arm/linux.git xenbits tree 2017-12-05 18:41 ` Ian Jackson @ 2017-12-05 18:42 ` Julien Grall 2017-12-08 15:09 ` linux-xen-arm branch update Julien Grall 0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: Julien Grall @ 2017-12-05 18:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ian Jackson, Stefano Stabellini; +Cc: xen-devel Hi Ian, On 05/12/17 18:41, Ian Jackson wrote: > Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [OSSTEST PATCH] linux-arm-xen: Get from shared arm/linux.git xenbits tree"): >> On Tue, 5 Dec 2017, Julien Grall wrote: >>> Acked-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org> >> >> Acked-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> > > Thanks. This queued for my next osstest push, which I expect to do > some time tomorrow. Thank you! Once we get the push, I will update the tree to the latest 4.9 (we are using an ancient version). Cheers, -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* linux-xen-arm branch update 2017-12-05 18:42 ` Julien Grall @ 2017-12-08 15:09 ` Julien Grall 0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread From: Julien Grall @ 2017-12-08 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ian Jackson, Stefano Stabellini; +Cc: xen-devel On 05/12/17 18:42, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi Ian, > > On 05/12/17 18:41, Ian Jackson wrote: >> Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [OSSTEST PATCH] linux-arm-xen: Get >> from shared arm/linux.git xenbits tree"): >>> On Tue, 5 Dec 2017, Julien Grall wrote: >>>> Acked-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org> >>> >>> Acked-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> >> >> Thanks. This queued for my next osstest push, which I expect to do >> some time tomorrow. > > Thank you! Once we get the push, I will update the tree to the latest > 4.9 (we are using an ancient version). FIY, we got a push. So I have updated to the latest 4.9.y. Cheers, > > Cheers, > -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-12-08 15:09 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 17+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2017-10-20 14:34 linux-arm-xen branch, commit access, etc Ian Jackson 2017-10-20 15:56 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2017-10-20 17:17 ` Stefano Stabellini 2017-10-20 17:45 ` Ian Jackson 2017-10-20 18:04 ` Stefano Stabellini 2017-10-20 19:10 ` Julien Grall 2017-10-23 21:33 ` Stefano Stabellini 2017-11-02 13:34 ` Julien Grall 2017-12-05 15:46 ` Julien Grall 2017-12-05 17:42 ` Ian Jackson 2017-12-05 17:57 ` Julien Grall 2017-12-05 18:28 ` [OSSTEST PATCH] linux-arm-xen: Get from shared arm/linux.git xenbits tree Ian Jackson 2017-12-05 18:30 ` Julien Grall 2017-12-05 18:34 ` Stefano Stabellini 2017-12-05 18:41 ` Ian Jackson 2017-12-05 18:42 ` Julien Grall 2017-12-08 15:09 ` linux-xen-arm branch update Julien Grall
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).