From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Guthro Subject: Re: Xen4.2 S3 regression? Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 10:28:37 -0400 Message-ID: <27134645888804121@unknownmsgid> References: <20120807163320.GC15053@phenom.dumpdata.com> <502240F302000078000937A6@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <5023F5400200007800093F4E@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <5023F8B80200007800093F8C@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <5024CB720200007800094124@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <502B75BA0200007800094FD4@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <502BB8FD02000078000951E0@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <502CCC0002000078000955C4@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <502CF0A8020000780009574E@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <504494FB0200007800098398@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <50462B9D02000078000987A4@nat28.tlf.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <50462B9D02000078000987A4@nat28.tlf.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , xen-devel , Ben Guthro , Thomas Goetz , "john.baboval@citrix.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org How is it that it works with an older hypervisor, then? Konrad - is the v7 code functionally different than the v10 code, or is it more stylistic changes? On Sep 4, 2012, at 10:25 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 04.09.12 at 14:49, Ben Guthro wrote: >> I forgot to address your dom0 kernel concern - >> >> All of these tests have been run with Konrad Wilk's acpi-s3.vX branches. >> >> The later kernels took more recent branches, while the 3.2.yy kernels >> used an older (but still functional) branch (acpi-s3.v7) > > This and the log you provided suggest that your kernel is lacking > the MSI restore code altogether (or it is not getting called as > intended). With that, there's pretty little point in continuing > the investigation on the hypervisor side. > > Jan >