From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Fantu <fantonifabio@tiscali.it>
Subject: Question about xen/stable branch in kernel pv_ops
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 00:59:30 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <27714378.post@talk.nabble.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org


I see new branch (xen/stable) in pv_ops based on 2.6.32.9, is good? for test
it there only to change xen/master in xen/stable in
buildconfig/mk.linux-2.6-pvops right?
I also see update in this page, for use config example for xen/stable i must
use "64bit x86_64 (xen/next 2.6.32)"?
Why is add CONFIG_XEN_PCIDEV_FRONTEND=y in page but there isn't in example
config?

Thanks advance for any reply
-- 
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Question-about-xen-stable-branch-in-kernel-pv_ops-tp27714378p27714378.html
Sent from the Xen - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.