From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Fantu <fantonifabio@tiscali.it>
Subject: Re: Question about xen/stable branch in kernel pv_ops
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 23:28:45 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <27740714.post@talk.nabble.com>
References: <27714378.post@talk.nabble.com> <4B878697.8050904@tiscali.it>
	<20100226084213.GJ2761@reaktio.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <20100226084213.GJ2761@reaktio.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org


Now with config example in wiki page do very big modules and initrd, is
possible do same config without only not necessary for do more small?

Pasi K=C3=A4rkk=C3=A4inen wrote:
>=20
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 09:30:15AM +0100, Fabio Fantoni wrote:
>>    Il 25/02/2010 20:05, Jeremy Fitzhardinge ha scritto:
>>=20
>>      On 02/25/2010 12:59 AM, Fantu wrote:
>>=20
>>        I see new branch (xen/stable) in pv_ops based on 2.6.32.9, is
>> good?
>>        for test
>>        it there only to change xen/master in xen/stable in
>>        buildconfig/mk.linux-2.6-pvops right?
>>        I also see update in this page, for use config example for
>> xen/stable
>>        i must
>>        use "64bit x86_64 (xen/next 2.6.32)"?
>>        Why is add CONFIG_XEN_PCIDEV_FRONTEND=3Dy in page but there isn't=
 in
>>        example
>>        config?
>>=20
>>=20
>>      xen/stable is still a work in progress, but it should be suitable
>> for
>>      general use.  It is based on xen/next (which is 2.6.32 based), but
>> it
>>      also has the 2.6.32.x stable kernels merged into it.
>>=20
>>      At the moment it is missing a few features compared to xen/master;
>> in
>>      particular it is missing PCI passthrough and ACPI power management.
>>=20
>>      This will become a long-term supported Xen kernel (as 2.6.32 is
>> going to
>>      be a long-term supported Linux release).  There will also be a
>>      development tree which tracks ongoing Linux development.
>>=20
>>          J
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>>  Nessun virus nel messaggio in arrivo.
>>  Controllato da AVG - [1]www.avg.com
>>  Versione: 9.0.733 / Database dei virus: 271.1.1/2709 -  Data di
>> rilascio: 02/25/10 08:34:00
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>>    I have try to change xen/master in xen/stable or xen/next but give
>> error:
>>    error: pathspec 'xen/stable' did not match any file(s) known to git.
>>    error: pathspec 'xen/next' did not match any file(s) known to git.
>>=20
>=20
> git pull
> git reset --hard
> git checkout -b xen/stable origin/xen/stable
> git pull
>=20
> and verify the changelog with "git log" and compare to output from:
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=3Dlinux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git;a=3Dshortlog;h=
=3Dxen/stable
>=20
> -- Pasi
>=20
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>=20
>=20

--=20
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Question-about-xen-stab=
le-branch-in-kernel-pv_ops-tp27714378p27740714.html
Sent from the Xen - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.