From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jaeyong Yoo <jaeyong.yoo@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/4] arm: regarding live migration
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 10:30:57 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <32542401.34731370428257378.JavaMail.weblogic@epv6ml01>
Reply-To: jaeyong.yoo@samsung.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
MIME-version: 1.0
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

> > > For this matter, I have following questions:
> > > 
> > > (1) Is it OK to keep using the keyword "hvm"? Or, is it better to use pvh?
> > 
> > My personal preference is to avoid either of them, they are IMHO x86
> > specific terms. On ARM we (currently) have only "domains", there aren't
> > (yet) multiple types of domain
> 
> BTW, I appreciate that the term HVM at least is part of the common
> hypercall API which we share with x86 -- we just have to live with that
> I think.

Got it.

Jaeyong