From: James Dingwall <james@dingwall.me.uk>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@kernel.org>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [james-xen@dingwall.me.uk: [Xen-users] Xen 4.2.0 - CPU Frequency Scaling]
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 21:27:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3d2b4499921255b00c1844a133efeb93@imap.dingwall.me.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACJDEmo6VujFoYWahfyswNNPjaH6QBOe6MSw40tyARxc5QYLAA@mail.gmail.com>
On 2012-10-01 17:33, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 12:13 PM, James Dingwall
> <james@dingwall.me.uk> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I didn't get any response on xen-users for this issue but so I'm
>> hoping
>> -devel can help.
>
> Lets see if we can help you.
Thank you:)
>> I have had problems using cpu frequency scaling since the
>> xen-acpi-processor code was added to the mainline kernel source. I
>> wasn't sure if the problem I was seeing was related to the old
>> version
>> (4.1.2) of Xen that I was using but now I'm on 4.2.0 and it still
>> exists
>> I thought I would check if I have a misconfiguration or if I have
>> discovered a problem. My system is a dual AMD Opteron(tm) Processor
>> 2423 HE on kernel 3.4.8.
>>
>> The xen command line is:
>> console=vga,com2 com2=115200,8n1 dom0_mem=max:2048M
>> dom0_max_vcpus=2
>> dom0_vcpus_pin
>
> Do you nee the dom0_max_vcpus=2? If they are not present does the
> problem persist?
>>
>> The CPU scaling information reported by xenpm is below. The problem
>> is that only cpuid 1 can be managed separately, all the others are
>
> What exactly are you trying to manage? As in what are you doing?
What I was trying to achieve was 2 vcpus assigned and pinned to dom0
with the remaining available for domUs. I wanted to set the scaling
governor as performance for the dom0 vcpus and ondemand for domUs.
It was an obvious test to change dom0_max_vcpus and I should have done
it before. On removing the parameter so that all cpus were seen in dom0
I could control the power state of them all independently. Reinstating
the parameter with value of n showed that cpu 1 - (n-1) could be
controlled independently while cpus 0 and n-11 were grouped together.
>> bundled together and cannot be handled independently which used to
>> be
>> possible with the old xen kernel. If further information would be
>> useful please let me know.
I did have a look at xen-acpi-processor.c but it is a bit beyond me and
perhaps not even the right place to start.
Thanks,
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-01 20:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-30 16:13 [james-xen@dingwall.me.uk: [Xen-users] Xen 4.2.0 - CPU Frequency Scaling] James Dingwall
2012-10-01 16:33 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-10-01 20:27 ` James Dingwall [this message]
2012-10-02 19:08 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-10-02 21:30 ` James Dingwall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3d2b4499921255b00c1844a133efeb93@imap.dingwall.me.uk \
--to=james@dingwall.me.uk \
--cc=konrad@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).