From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@novell.com>
To: Joe Jin <joe.jin@oracle.com>
Cc: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@citrix.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, deepak.patel@oracle.com,
greg.marsden@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix blkback/blktap sysfs read bug.
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 07:46:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B56C2DB020000780002AE45@vpn.id2.novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100120020605.GA25697@joejin-pc.cn.oracle.com>
>>> "Joe Jin" <joe.jin@oracle.com> 20.01.10 03:06 >>>
>sysfs did not provide lock to handle this, not sure if developer
>think it is not necessary or they'd like to caller to handled it.
A lock is probably not the usual way to deal with this; ref-counting
would seem more common. Nevertheless I think adding a lock will
take care of the issue here.
>--- a/drivers/xen/blktap/xenbus.c Fri Jan 08 13:07:17 2010 +0000
>+++ b/drivers/xen/blktap/xenbus.c Wed Jan 20 10:00:53 2010 +0800
>...
>@@ -122,10 +123,15 @@
> struct device_attribute *attr, \
> char *buf) \
> { \
>+ ssize_t ret = -ENODEV; \
> struct xenbus_device *dev = to_xenbus_device(_dev); \
The use of to_xenbus_device() here makes ...
>- struct backend_info *be = dev->dev.driver_data; \
>+ struct backend_info *be; \
> \
>- return sprintf(buf, format, ##args); \
>+ read_lock(&sysfs_read_lock); \
>+ if (dev && (be = dev->dev.driver_data) && be->blkif) \
... the checking of dev here useless (and the blkback part of the patch
doesn't do the same).
>+ ret = sprintf(buf, format, ##args); \
>+ read_unlock(&sysfs_read_lock); \
>+ return ret; \
> } \
> static DEVICE_ATTR(name, S_IRUGO, show_##name, NULL)
>
And btw., in both cases with the lock added there's no need to check
both 'be' and 'be->blkif', since be->blkif can't be NULL when be is
non-NULL.
Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-20 7:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-19 9:52 [PATCH] Fix blkback/blktap sysfs read bug Joe Jin
2010-01-19 10:25 ` Jan Beulich
2010-01-19 11:32 ` Joe Jin
2010-01-19 12:06 ` Jan Beulich
2010-01-19 14:13 ` Joe Jin
2010-01-19 16:20 ` Jan Beulich
2010-01-20 2:06 ` Joe Jin
2010-01-20 7:46 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2010-01-20 10:51 ` Joe Jin
2010-01-20 11:06 ` Jan Beulich
2010-01-20 11:45 ` Joe Jin
2010-01-20 20:25 ` Keir Fraser
2010-01-21 2:16 ` Daniel Stodden
2010-01-21 3:13 ` Joe Jin
2010-01-21 7:26 ` Daniel Stodden
2010-01-21 7:49 ` Joe Jin
2010-01-21 18:01 ` Daniel Stodden
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B56C2DB020000780002AE45@vpn.id2.novell.com \
--to=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=deepak.patel@oracle.com \
--cc=greg.marsden@oracle.com \
--cc=joe.jin@oracle.com \
--cc=keir.fraser@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).