From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Weidong Han Subject: Re: Xen 4.0.0 first release candidate / graphics passthru Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 21:03:54 +0800 Message-ID: <4B5850BA.7000905@intel.com> References: <20100121085407.GJ2861@reaktio.net> <20100121091215.GL2861@reaktio.net> <4B5823CF.6090907@intel.com> <20100121095551.GN2861@reaktio.net> <4B582B5D.5020803@intel.com> <1543934197.20100121131021@eikelenboom.it> <4B584D96.1090101@intel.com> <20100121125633.GV2861@reaktio.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100121125633.GV2861@reaktio.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Pasi_K=E4rkk=E4inen?= Cc: Sander Eikelenboom , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , "Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming)" , Keir Fraser , Jean Guyader List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Pasi K=E4rkk=E4inen wrote: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 08:50:30PM +0800, Weidong Han wrote: > =20 >> Sander Eikelenboom wrote: >> =20 >>> Hello Weidong, >>> >>> Hmm I guess I have missed something, are all other (IGD etc.) VGA pas= sthrough patches allready merged in 4.0.0-rc1 ? >>> =20 >>> =20 >> No, I sent the patchset months ago, but not checked in. >> =20 >>> And should it work then with both 2.6.31.6-pvops and 2.6.18.8-xen do= m0 ? >>> =20 >>> =20 >> We will rebase the patchset for both 2.6.18 and pvops dom0, and resend= =20 >> if for check in after xen 4.0. >> >> =20 > > Is there some specific reason to not have it in now, for Xen 4.0?=20 > =20 It needs some efforts to rebase it to latest Xen. If you don't think=20 it's too late for Xen 4.0, we can try to complete it in a few days. Regards, Weidong