From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vincent Hanquez Subject: Re: Xen 4.0 + Kernel 2.6.32 + Debian Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:55:26 +0000 Message-ID: <4B6053DE.10804@eu.citrix.com> References: <529a12f41001270402j29c5fb72t3aa15342678912@mail.gmail.com> <6b7f6eb1001270452k4a40a4d1g3ffb790d4c1130d4@mail.gmail.com> <20100127130551.GK2861@reaktio.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100127130551.GK2861@reaktio.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Pasi_K=E4rkk=E4inen?= Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Xen-devel , Sassy Natan , Josip Rodin , Thiago Camargo Martins Cordeiro List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Pasi K=E4rkk=E4inen wrote: > > The idea of Xen Clout Platform is that it includes the full integrated = platform=20 > that is tested as a whole: > > - Linux distribution (CentOS) > - Dom0 kernel (2.6.27 based on SLES11 kernel-xen) > - Xen hypervisor (3.4.x) > - Management toolstack (xapi) > > So if you change the distribution to Debian, then it would be kind of a= different product :) > =20 Yet there's no reason the platform shouldn't be linux distribution agnost= ic. The choice of linux distribution (and for that matter dom0 kernel and=20 xen version) is arbitrary, and just happens to be what we test and develop on. --=20 Vincent