From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jan Beulich" Subject: RE: [RFC] [PATCH] Dom0: Don't switch back to user space stack in syscall entry Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:16:14 +0000 Message-ID: <4B751C5E020000780002F306@vpn.id2.novell.com> References: <4B72F72F.3080107@goop.org> <4B73D3A7020000780002EE6D@vpn.id2.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Yunhong Jiang Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Keir Fraser List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org >>> "Jiang, Yunhong" 12.02.10 05:30 >>> >Are there any issue currently for nesting interrupt? The issue here is >because of the syscall's stack, which is not strictly related to nesting >interrupt, I think. For the specific syscall case there probably aren't (but I didn't fully think this through). But for the general case there are, so if IST-like support is to be added, it should account for nesting. Jan