From: Weidong Han <weidong.han@intel.com>
To: Noboru Iwamatsu <n_iwamatsu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
"Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com" <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] gfx_passthru: warning when vgabios rom has invalid checksum
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:56:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B8246C5.4090005@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B82398B.6020109@jp.fujitsu.com>
Noboru Iwamatsu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >> Intel DX58SO + GeForce GTS250: checksum is OK.
> >> Intel DX58SO + GeForce 9600GT: checksum is OK.
> >> Fujitsu Q35 M/B + IGD: checksum is bad.
> >>
> > What does "checksum is bad" mean here?
>
> It means shadowed VGABIOS has invalid checksum
> and requires recalculating.
>
> >> What do you think, Weidong?
> >> Is just warning enough? Or, should we stop loading the rom?
> >>
> >>
> > Does it still work or not when checksum is bad? If it works, we should
> > not stop loading the rom.
>
> When the checksum is bad,
> if it is not recalculated, guest has some trouble about handling the
> VGA (unable to show BIOS screen, unable to load the gfx driver
> properly, ...).
For this case, it's reasonable to warning and stop loading rom. We
didn't encounter this issue.
> If it is recalculated, it seems to work fine.
>
How did you recalculate it? is it possible to recalculate it when detect
invalid checksum?
Regards,
Weidong
> Regards,
> Noboru.
>
>
>> Noboru Iwamatsu wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> According to the "PCI Firmware Spec Rev 3.0",
>>> the system firmware have to write the new checksum after resizing
>>> the expansion ROM area.
>>>
>>> So, when re-using the shadowed VGABIOS, the checksum must
>>> be valid, and if it is invalid, we should consider the BIOS has
>>> a bug or memory area is corrupted.
>>>
>>> This patch just add the warning message when checksum requires
>>> recalculation.
>>>
>>> I tried this following environments.
>>>
>>> Intel DX58SO + GeForce GTS250: checksum is OK.
>>> Intel DX58SO + GeForce 9600GT: checksum is OK.
>>> Fujitsu Q35 M/B + IGD: checksum is bad.
>>>
>>>
>> What does "checksum is bad" mean here?
>>
>>> What do you think, Weidong?
>>> Is just warning enough? Or, should we stop loading the rom?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Does it still work or not when checksum is bad? If it works, we should
>> not stop loading the rom.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Weidong
>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Noboru.
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-22 8:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-22 5:45 [PATCH][RFC] gfx_passthru: warning when vgabios rom has invalid checksum Noboru Iwamatsu
2010-02-22 7:21 ` Weidong Han
2010-02-22 8:00 ` Noboru Iwamatsu
2010-02-22 8:56 ` Weidong Han [this message]
2010-02-22 9:47 ` Noboru Iwamatsu
2010-02-22 10:08 ` Weidong Han
2010-02-23 17:59 ` Ian Jackson
2010-02-24 1:34 ` Noboru Iwamatsu
2010-02-24 2:50 ` Weidong Han
2010-02-25 4:54 ` Noboru Iwamatsu
2010-02-25 5:53 ` Weidong Han
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B8246C5.4090005@intel.com \
--to=weidong.han@intel.com \
--cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=n_iwamatsu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).