From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joanna Rutkowska Subject: Re: A clocksource question Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 13:10:03 +0100 Message-ID: <4B963A9B.9010602@invisiblethingslab.com> References: <4B9628F3.5060101@invisiblethingslab.com> <4B962BD1.3060307@invisiblethingslab.com> <20100309120717.GL2580@reaktio.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0005400792==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100309120717.GL2580@reaktio.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Pasi_K=E4rkk=E4inen?= Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Keir Fraser List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --===============0005400792== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig8B07ABFF52B6BBC926595B7E" This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig8B07ABFF52B6BBC926595B7E Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 03/09/2010 01:07 PM, Pasi K=E4rkk=E4inen wrote: > On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 12:06:57PM +0100, Joanna Rutkowska wrote: >> On 03/09/2010 11:54 AM, Joanna Rutkowska wrote: >>> On 03/09/2010 11:50 AM, Keir Fraser wrote: >>>> On 09/03/2010 10:47, "Joanna Rutkowska" >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Interestingly the above problem didn't seem to affect the Dom0 kern= el >>>>> based on xen/stable-2.6.32. Unfortunately I assume I'm no longer ab= le to >>>>> run this kernel when using Xen 3.4.2. >>>> >>>> You could run the 3.4.3 release candidates? >>>> >>> Let's just say that after my recent experience with a 4.0.0 release >>> candidate, I decided to use a stable version (or at least for the >>> hypervisor) for now :) I really want to use on a production system. >>> >>> Perhaps you would say that in that case I should not be using a pvops= 0 >>> kernel at all? But what would be a good alternative with all reasonab= le >>> hardware support then? >>> >> ...plus the xen/stable-2.6/.32 doesn't have the pciback, which I happe= n >> to need in Dom0... >> >=20 > Your options are listed here: > http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenDom0Kernels >=20 Ok, but what about the original question about what is the preferred clocksource setting and perhaps some comments on various settings? Thanks, joanna. --------------enig8B07ABFF52B6BBC926595B7E Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkuWOpsACgkQORdkotfEW86HXgCggURvXt3Dw+IAtBYUfzC20Nus sSAAoLONowWhsp14QYXlHXiHTqhUIBP9 =YOmq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig8B07ABFF52B6BBC926595B7E-- --===============0005400792== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel --===============0005400792==--