From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:45:47 -0800
Message-ID: <4B97F6EB.9010505@goop.org>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1003101457100.28412@kaball-desktop>	<20100310173339.GO1878@reaktio.net> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1003101739480.28412@kaball-desktop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1003101739480.28412@kaball-desktop>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Pasi_K=E4rkk=E4inen?= <pasik@iki.fi>, "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 03/10/2010 09:55 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> However it might be still possible to provide an additional, backward
> compatible, delivery mechanism in case the new one fails.
> I'll try to explore this option.
>    

Yes, please.  A lot of the interest in pv drivers for hvm comes from 
people running long-deployed Xen systems based on RHEL, etc.

     J