From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yasir Assam Subject: Re: current xen/stable 2.6.32.9 failed upgrade from 2.6.31.6 Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 08:41:35 +1100 Message-ID: <4B9AB50F.7020500@endlessvoid.com> References: <785487.69217.qm@web56108.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0950727624==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <785487.69217.qm@web56108.mail.re3.yahoo.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Boris Derzhavets Cc: Xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============0950727624== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070105090406080403090504" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------070105090406080403090504 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I'm going to stick with 4.0.0rc6 for now because it seems to be stable - this is a production machine (hardware is too new for older stable dom0 & xen which is why I'm using the latest software). Yasir > OK. Current 3.4.3 is good enough to load 2.6.32.9. You don't have upgrade > Hypervisor to test 2.6.32.9. All required change sets (CSs) ( i guess > just 1 by Xiantao Zang, which is connected with APIC rework ) have > been back ported to 3.4.3 a while ago. > > Boris. > > --- On *Thu, 3/11/10, Yasir Assam //* wrote: > > > From: Yasir Assam > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] current xen/stable 2.6.32.9 failed > upgrade from 2.6.31.6 > To: "Boris Derzhavets" > Cc: "Xen-devel" > Date: Thursday, March 11, 2010, 9:22 PM > > I don't know what you mean by "load 2.6.32.9 required CS back ported" > > Yasir >> Try the most recent 3.4.3 and load 2.6.32.9 required CS back ported. >> >> --- On *Thu, 3/11/10, Yasir Assam //* wrote: >> >> >> From: Yasir Assam >> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] current xen/stable 2.6.32.9 failed >> upgrade from 2.6.31.6 >> To: "Xen-devel" >> Date: Thursday, March 11, 2010, 6:25 PM >> >> I had this problem too a couple of days back (2.6.32.9 dom0 >> on Xen 3.4.2 - screen blank on boot). I didn't try 3.4.3rc3 >> but went straight to 4.0.0-rc6 and it booted ok. >> >> Yasir >>> On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 03:16:15PM -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: >>> >>>> On 03/07/2010 03:31 PM, Josip Rodin wrote: >>>> >>>>>> but when you update the dom0 kernel to current xen/master 2.6.31.6, it crashes? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> When I update it to current xen/stable 2.6.32.9. (I put that bit in the >>>>> subject only, sorry.) >>>>> >>>> So 2.6.31.6 is OK on the 3.4.3rc3? It's just the new dom0 which fails? >>>> >>> Yes. >>> >>> (Sorry for the delay in further testing, I'm still waiting for users to >>> ACK a new downtime.) >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>> Checked by AVG -www.avg.com >>> Version: 9.0.733 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2731 - Release Date: 03/09/10 06:33:00 >>> >>> >> >> >> -----Inline Attachment Follows----- >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Xen-devel mailing list >> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com >> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel >> >> >> >> >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG -www.avg.com >> Version: 9.0.733 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2736 - Release Date: 03/11/10 18:33:00 >> >> > > > -----Inline Attachment Follows----- > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel > > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 9.0.733 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2736 - Release Date: 03/11/10 18:33:00 > > --------------070105090406080403090504 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I'm going to stick with 4.0.0rc6 for now because it seems to be stable - this is a production machine (hardware is too new for older stable dom0 & xen which is why I'm using the latest software).

Yasir
OK. Current 3.4.3 is good enough to load 2.6.32.9.  You don't have upgrade
Hypervisor to test 2.6.32.9. All required change sets (CSs) ( i guess just 1 by Xiantao Zang, which  is connected with APIC rework ) have been back ported to 3.4.3 a while ago.

Boris.

--- On Thu, 3/11/10, Yasir Assam <mail@endlessvoid.com> wrote:

From: Yasir Assam <mail@endlessvoid.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] current xen/stable 2.6.32.9 failed upgrade from 2.6.31.6
To: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@yahoo.com>
Cc: "Xen-devel" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Date: Thursday, March 11, 2010, 9:22 PM

I don't know what you mean by "load 2.6.32.9 required CS back ported"

Yasir
Try the most recent 3.4.3 and load 2.6.32.9 required CS back ported.

--- On Thu, 3/11/10, Yasir Assam <mail@endlessvoid.com> wrote:

From: Yasir Assam <mail@endlessvoid.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] current xen/stable 2.6.32.9 failed upgrade from 2.6.31.6
To: "Xen-devel" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Date: Thursday, March 11, 2010, 6:25 PM

I had this problem too a couple of days back (2.6.32.9 dom0 on Xen 3.4.2 - screen blank on boot). I didn't try 3.4.3rc3 but went straight to 4.0.0-rc6 and it booted ok.

Yasir
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 03:16:15PM -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
  
On 03/07/2010 03:31 PM, Josip Rodin wrote:
    
but when you update the dom0 kernel to current xen/master 2.6.31.6, it crashes?
     
        
When I update it to current xen/stable 2.6.32.9. (I put that bit in the
subject only, sorry.)
      
So 2.6.31.6 is OK on the 3.4.3rc3?  It's just the new dom0 which fails?
    
Yes.

(Sorry for the delay in further testing, I'm still waiting for users to
ACK a new downtime.)

  


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 9.0.733 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2731 - Release Date: 03/09/10 06:33:00


-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 9.0.733 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2736 - Release Date: 03/11/10 18:33:00


-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
  


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 9.0.733 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2736 - Release Date: 03/11/10 18:33:00

--------------070105090406080403090504-- --===============0950727624== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel --===============0950727624==--