From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Jeremy's git tags Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:45:48 -0800 Message-ID: <4B9AB60C.8020109@goop.org> References: <93bc4af41003112132g1566595ewc6371e7ac3816f69@mail.gmail.com> <27874119.post@talk.nabble.com> <93bc4af41003120431h2c839b3ep4d55b49567bfcd9e@mail.gmail.com> <93bc4af41003121208s9ac9569j86bd2b85df346b82@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <93bc4af41003121208s9ac9569j86bd2b85df346b82@mail.gmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Dot Yet Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, xen-users@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 03/12/2010 12:08 PM, Dot Yet wrote: > OK. compilation of Lustre 1.8.2 on Jeremy's 2.6.32.9 and stock > 2.6.32.9, both failed. > > Can someone tell me how I can get 2.6.30.x from Jeremy's git repository? > I think it will be easiest to get version of Lustre forward-ported rather than trying to backport all the Xen stuff to an older kernel. That's assuming that what you want is a Xen-enabled Linux kernel with dom0 capability running Lustre. If you just want domU support, then a stock kernel.org 2.6.30.x will suit your purposes. J