From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:11:57 -0800 Message-ID: <4B9ABC2D.5010600@goop.org> References: <263212.50877.qm@web56107.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <263212.50877.qm@web56107.mail.re3.yahoo.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Boris Derzhavets Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Stefano Stabellini , Sheng Yang List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 03/12/2010 02:08 PM, Boris Derzhavets wrote: > Yes. > I can load 2.6.32.9 ( been built via xen/stable just now) under then > most recent Xen 4.0 (matching tip CS Xen's rpms have been rebuilt and > reinstalled on F12 following Michael Young ) via clone of original > xen-unstable tree patched per Steffano :- > http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2010-03/msg00452.html > Are you saying that a patched Xen with unpatched dom0 does not crash, but patched dom0 does crash? J