From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][v9 4/6] xen/hvm: Xen PV extension of HVM initialization Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:29:23 -0700 Message-ID: <4B9FBFF3.4090806@goop.org> References: <1268362647-5317-1-git-send-email-sheng@linux.intel.com> <4B9EBBEE.9020107@goop.org> <201003160951.48973.sheng@linux.intel.com> <4B9FBBEA.2060508@goop.org> <1268760010.10129.31253.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1268760010.10129.31253.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Ian Campbell Cc: Sheng Yang , Stefano Stabellini , xen-devel , "Yaozu (Eddie) Dong" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Ian Pratt , Keir Fraser List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 03/16/2010 10:20 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: > I don't think a new hypercall is required. Xen should simply pre-account > for the TSC offset which HVM guests are subject to in > __update_vcpu_system_time. > Yes, that would work too. J