From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: A clocksource question Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 10:21:22 -0700 Message-ID: <4BA10F92.90206@goop.org> References: <4B962748.90609@invisiblethingslab.com> <4B9BE7C0.2070401@goop.org> <4B9F1EC8.4020300@invisiblethingslab.com> <201003171435.45858.tobias.geiger@vido.info> <4BA10159.2000505@goop.org> <4BA10BD8.9000501@invisiblethingslab.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4BA10BD8.9000501@invisiblethingslab.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Joanna Rutkowska Cc: Tobias Geiger , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 03/17/2010 10:05 AM, Joanna Rutkowska wrote: > On 03/17/2010 05:20 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > >> On 03/17/2010 06:35 AM, Tobias Geiger wrote: >> >>> i also compiled 2.6.32.9 from xen/stable , but so far i can't see much >>> improvement. >>> >>> >> I'm not certain you got the relevent changeset; the "xen/stable" branch >> now has it, but I think I only updated it yesterday. xen/stable is now >> 2.6.32.10. >> >> >> > Correct, I used the xen/stable-2.6.32.x and indeed the xen/stable back a > few days ago did not have this hrtimer commit. > > Jeremy, I think there might be some confusion about xen/stable vs. > xen/stable-2.6.32.x as from your earlier email [1] it looked like those > should be the same things, while in fact they are not. > Keeping them in sync is manual, and I forgot in that case. Well, I could justify it as being conservative in case the change introduced a regression. J