From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@novell.com>
To: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>,
Yunhong Jiang <yunhong.jiang@intel.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: RE: [PATCH] Allocate vmcs pages when system booting
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 10:45:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BA212510200007800035AF5@vpn.id2.novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C775F48B.66D1%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
>>> Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com> 15.01.10 11:31 >>>
>On 15/01/2010 09:30, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@novell.com> wrote:
>
>>>>> "Jiang, Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang@intel.com> 15.01.10 10:06 >>>
>>> b) Can we still turn to the original patch, i.e. pre-allocate all VMCS pages
>>> for all possible CPU?
>>
>> I'm generally opposed to pre-allocations, at least as long as all CPUs are
>> considered 'possible'. Building with a relatively high nr_cpus= setting
>> and then running on a relatively small system results in (close to)
>> unacceptable overhead.
>>
>> In fact it's really not clear to me why cpu_possible_map must be set to
>> CPU_MASK_ALL - if Linux has ways to avoid this, Xen should have too.
>
>Does Linux manage a good reliable job of cutting down cpu_possible_map? That
>would save cpu_possible_map in my eyes, if we could do that. Otherwise it is
>indeed pretty useless now. Either way, I'd like cpu hotplug notifier chains
>in the 4.1 development window.
Only now got to look into this: Linux simply counts the disabled CPUs
along with the present ones, plus it allows a command line override to
the number of CPU slots reserved for hotplug. I just put together
something similar, partly copying code over from there. Will submit
post-4.0.
Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-18 10:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-12 10:52 [PATCH] Allocate vmcs pages when system booting Jiang, Yunhong
2009-11-12 11:22 ` Keir Fraser
2009-11-12 14:58 ` Jiang, Yunhong
2009-11-12 15:04 ` Keir Fraser
2009-11-12 15:15 ` Jiang, Yunhong
2010-01-15 9:06 ` Jiang, Yunhong
2010-01-15 9:30 ` Jan Beulich
2010-01-15 10:31 ` Keir Fraser
2010-01-17 2:02 ` Jiang, Yunhong
2010-01-17 21:35 ` Keir Fraser
2010-01-18 8:11 ` Keir Fraser
2010-01-18 8:22 ` Jiang, Yunhong
2010-03-18 10:45 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2010-03-18 10:51 ` Keir Fraser
2010-03-19 2:17 ` Jiang, Yunhong
2010-01-15 10:28 ` Keir Fraser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BA212510200007800035AF5@vpn.id2.novell.com \
--to=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
--cc=yunhong.jiang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).