xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	Sheng Yang <sheng@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 09:50:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BA259D3.1010202@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1003181331150.23661@kaball-desktop>

On 03/18/2010 07:22 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Also XEN_HVM_PV_EVTCHN_ENABLED is not a good name for it because we'll
> be able to receive evtchns anyway using xen platform device interrupts.
> Maybe XEN_HVM_IPI_CALLBACK_ENABLE?
>    

I'm OK with the original name.  The point is not that we're getting 
events from evtchns, but that the mechanism allows us to receive them 
without having to touch the APICs and suffer the vmexits.  To the rest 
of the kernel, events delivered via the platform device are really just 
ordinary interrupts from an ordinary device which happens to have a 
particularly elaborate "interrupt source" register.

     J

  reply	other threads:[~2010-03-18 16:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-10 15:46 [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen Stefano Stabellini
2010-03-10 17:33 ` [Xen-devel] " Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-03-10 17:55   ` Stefano Stabellini
2010-03-10 19:45     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-03-12  3:23 ` Sheng Yang
2010-03-12 10:42   ` [Xen-devel] " Stefano Stabellini
2010-03-12 16:00     ` Stefano Stabellini
2010-03-15  4:05       ` Sheng Yang
2010-03-15  8:29         ` Sheng Yang
2010-03-15 12:22           ` Stefano Stabellini
2010-03-17  9:38             ` Sheng Yang
2010-03-17 14:18               ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-03-17 15:21               ` Stefano Stabellini
2010-03-17 16:13                 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-03-18  1:30                   ` Sheng Yang
2010-03-19 20:38                     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-03-22  6:26                       ` MSI proposal and work transfer...(was: Re: [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen) Sheng Yang
2010-03-23 20:47                         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-03-24  8:19                           ` Sheng Yang
2010-03-23 23:16                         ` Stefano Stabellini
2010-03-24  8:25                           ` Sheng Yang
2010-03-18  2:19                 ` [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen Sheng Yang
2010-03-18 16:42                   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-03-17 16:13               ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-03-15 12:28         ` Stefano Stabellini
2010-03-15 23:08           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-03-15 23:24             ` Frank van der Linden
2010-03-16  0:32             ` Dan Magenheimer
2010-03-16  6:09               ` Sheng Yang
2010-03-16 16:46                 ` Dan Magenheimer
2010-03-16 11:07             ` Stefano Stabellini
2010-03-16 17:23               ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-03-16 17:32                 ` Stefano Stabellini
2010-03-16 17:41                   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-03-16 18:06                     ` Stefano Stabellini
2010-03-16 18:26                       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-03-16 18:37                         ` Stefano Stabellini
2010-03-17  8:51                           ` Sheng Yang
2010-03-17  9:18                             ` Sheng Yang
2010-03-17 15:17                               ` Stefano Stabellini
2010-03-17 18:20                                 ` Ian Campbell
2010-03-18  1:42                                   ` Sheng Yang
2010-03-18  1:35                                 ` Sheng Yang
2010-03-18 14:22                                   ` Stefano Stabellini
2010-03-18 16:50                                     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2010-03-18 17:30                                 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-03-12 21:53     ` [Xen-devel] " Jeremy Fitzhardinge
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-03-12 11:44 Boris Derzhavets
2010-03-12 11:59 ` Stefano Stabellini
2010-03-12 15:01   ` Boris Derzhavets
2010-03-12 15:08     ` Stefano Stabellini
2010-03-12 15:09       ` Boris Derzhavets
2010-03-12 20:10     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-03-12 21:14       ` Boris Derzhavets
2010-03-12 21:22         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-03-12 21:28           ` Boris Derzhavets
2010-03-12 21:25       ` Boris Derzhavets
2010-03-12 21:29         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-03-12 22:08           ` Boris Derzhavets
2010-03-12 22:11             ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-03-12 22:13               ` Boris Derzhavets
2010-03-12 22:22                 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-03-15 15:53                   ` Stefano Stabellini
2010-03-15 16:02                     ` Boris Derzhavets
2010-03-15 17:27                   ` Stefano Stabellini
2010-03-15 17:49                     ` Boris Derzhavets
2010-03-15 18:01                       ` Stefano Stabellini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4BA259D3.1010202@goop.org \
    --to=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=sheng@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).