From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 10:30:42 -0700
Message-ID: <4BA26342.5080800@goop.org>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1003101457100.28412@kaball-desktop>
	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1003161834570.23661@kaball-desktop>
	<201003171651.05220.sheng@linux.intel.com>
	<201003171718.37598.sheng@linux.intel.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1003171100310.23661@kaball-desktop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1003171100310.23661@kaball-desktop>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, Sheng Yang <sheng@linux.intel.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 03/17/2010 08:17 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Finally I would still like the call to xen_guest_init to be moved
> afterwards: if we move it after kvm_guest_init we can be pretty sure
> that upstream is going to accept it. Besides ACPI is currently working
> with your patch series applied, when and if we break ACPI we'll worry
> about it.
>    

Why/how does ACPI get broken?  I think that's something we should 
definitely avoid doing.

     J