From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ breaks single VCPU domain 0 between xen/master and xen/next Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:45:30 -0700 Message-ID: <4BA40C9A.3010902@goop.org> References: <1267184533.11737.12277.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <1267185902.11737.12315.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <1267201049.11737.12593.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <4B8804D1.70408@goop.org> <4B8EE42D.2090702@goop.org> <1269011246.10129.45553.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1269011246.10129.45553.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ian Campbell Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , "Zhang, Xiantao" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 03/19/2010 08:07 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: > It looks like you guys have got the issue of identify the correct number > of physical interrupts and handling the APIC setup correctly etc in hand > but do we also need to consider taking the patch in > http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2010-03/msg00028.html > as well in order to ensure we have plenty of dynamic interrupts until > such a time as they can be fully dynamically allocated? > Just reminded myself of this by booting a UP nested Xen. Pulled. J