From: Weidong Han <weidong.han@intel.com>
To: "Pasi Kärkkäinen" <pasik@iki.fi>
Cc: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@eikelenboom.it>,
"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: RE: [pvops xen/next ][iommu] attenpt to passthrough PCI-e usb controllor to PV domU: (XEN) traps.c:2309:d1 Domain attempted WRMSR 000000000000008b from 00000a07:00000000 to 00000000:00000000.
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:25:55 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BA737A3.4090708@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100322091917.GB1878@reaktio.net>
Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 05:13:33PM +0800, Weidong Han wrote:
>
>> Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 04:04:09PM +0800, Han, Weidong wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> The faults were caused by that the DMA address was not mapped in VT-d page table.
>>>>
>>>> Could you have following two tries:
>>>> 1) assign it to pv domU without VT-d
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Btw are there other methods of disabling VT-d PCI passhtru than having
>>> iommu=off for xen.gz in grub.conf? ie. can you somehow select "use
>>> normal PV passthru for this guest" and "but still use VT-d passthru for
>>> this guest" ?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> I'm not quite understand your point. do you mean use normal PV passthru
>> for pv guest, but still can passthru device to hvm guest? if so, current
>> xen VT-d already does like this.
>>
>>
>
> Yeah, that's what I meant. Ok.
>
> I thought it was also possible to use VT-d for a PV guest? no?
>
yes. you can use VT-d to assign device to pv guest. Sander was doing
that and encountered below issue.
Regards,
Weidong
> -- Pasi
>
>
>> Regards,
>> Weidong
>>
>>> ps. I'm just writing a xen wiki page for PCI passthru and adding these things and the common failure scenarios there.
>>>
>>> -- Pasi
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> 2) assign it to a hvm guest
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Weidong
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Sander Eikelenboom [mailto:linux@eikelenboom.it] Sent: Monday,
>>>> March 22, 2010 5:20 AM
>>>> To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
>>>> Cc: Han, Weidong; xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>>>> Subject: [pvops xen/next ][iommu] attenpt to passthrough PCI-e usb controllor to PV domU: (XEN) traps.c:2309:d1 Domain attempted WRMSR 000000000000008b from 00000a07:00000000 to 00000000:00000000.
>>>>
>>>> Hi Han/Konrad,
>>>>
>>>> In my setup i'm trying to passthrough an USB 3.0 pci-e controller to a PV domU.
>>>> - xen: 4.0.0-rc6
>>>> - dom0: kernel xen/next
>>>> - domU: kernel 2.6.33 from git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/konrad/xen.git
>>>> ( to have pci-front together with most recent usb3.0 xhci drivers.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> - USB 3.0 xhci drivers work fine on the baremetal with the 2.6.33 kernel.
>>>>
>>>> This is on a intel Q45 chipset with IOMMU.
>>>>
>>>> This is my boot config:
>>>> title xen-4.0.0-rc6.gz / Debian GNU/Linux, kernel 2.6.32
>>>> root (hd0,0)
>>>> kernel /boot/xen-4.0.0-rc6.gz dom0_mem=768M loglvl=all loglvl_guest=all iommu=pv iommu_inclusive_mapping=1
>>>> module /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32 root=/dev/sda1 ro earlyprintk=xen max_loop=255 xen-pciback.hide=(03:00.0)
>>>> module /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32
>>>>
>>>> When booting the domU xm dmesg gets filled with the following when the usb controller tries to initialize/:
>>>>
>>>> (XEN) traps.c:2309:d1 Domain attempted WRMSR 000000000000008b from 00000a07:00000000 to 00000000:00000000.
>>>> (XEN) [VT-D]iommu.c:821: iommu_fault_status: Primary Pending Fault
>>>> (XEN) [VT-D]iommu.c:796: DMAR:[DMA Read] Request device [03:00.0] fault addr 1ff94000, iommu reg = ffff82c3fff54000
>>>> (XEN) DMAR:[fault reason 06h] PTE Read access is not set
>>>> (XEN) print_vtd_entries: iommu = ffff83007c866970 bdf = 3:0.0 gmfn = 1ff94
>>>> (XEN) root_entry = ffff83007c872000
>>>> (XEN) root_entry[3] = 78f56001
>>>> (XEN) context = ffff830078f56000
>>>> (XEN) context[0] = 101_2f0e1001
>>>> (XEN) l3 = ffff83002f0e1000
>>>> (XEN) l3_index = 0
>>>> (XEN) l3[0] = 2f0e0003
>>>> (XEN) l2 = ffff83002f0e0000
>>>> (XEN) l2_index = ff
>>>> (XEN) l2[ff] = 0
>>>> (XEN) l2[ff] not present
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Anyone any tips on what i could try ?, is this something caused by xen, or something by the usb driver not adhering to kernel DMA-api ?
>>>>
>>>> Attached:
>>>>
>>>> - xm-info.txt
>>>> - xm-dmesg.txt
>>>> - xend.log
>>>>
>>>> - dom0-dmesg.txt
>>>> - dom0-lspci-tree.txt
>>>> - dom0-lspci.txt
>>>>
>>>> - domU-lspci.txt
>>>> - domU-dmesg.txt
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Xen-devel mailing list
>>>> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>>>>
>>>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-22 9:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-21 21:19 [pvops xen/next ][iommu] attenpt to passthrough PCI-e usb controllor to PV domU: (XEN) traps.c:2309:d1 Domain attempted WRMSR 000000000000008b from 00000a07:00000000 to 00000000:00000000 Sander Eikelenboom
2010-03-22 8:04 ` Han, Weidong
2010-03-22 9:04 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-03-22 9:13 ` Weidong Han
2010-03-22 9:19 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-03-22 9:22 ` Christian Tramnitz
2010-03-22 9:55 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-03-22 9:25 ` Weidong Han [this message]
2010-03-22 9:29 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-03-22 9:32 ` Weidong Han
2010-03-22 9:30 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2010-03-22 10:15 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2010-03-22 10:58 ` Jan Beulich
2010-03-22 13:14 ` Re: [pvops xen/next ] attenpt to passthrough PCI-e usb controllor to PV domU Sander Eikelenboom
2010-03-22 19:12 ` [pvops xen/next ][iommu] attenpt to passthrough PCI-e usb controllor to PV domU: (XEN) traps.c:2309:d1 Domain attempted WRMSR 000000000000008b from 00000a07:00000000 to 00000000:00000000 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-03-22 20:35 ` [pvops xen/next ][iommu] attenpt to passthrough PCI-e usb controllor to PV domU SUCCESS :-) Sander Eikelenboom
2010-03-22 20:30 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-03-22 20:49 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-03-22 21:23 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2010-03-22 21:26 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-03-22 21:12 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-03-23 7:05 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-03-23 10:16 ` Jan Beulich
2010-03-23 10:23 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2010-03-23 11:23 ` Jan Beulich
2010-03-23 11:24 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BA737A3.4090708@intel.com \
--to=weidong.han@intel.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux@eikelenboom.it \
--cc=pasik@iki.fi \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).