From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jan Beulich" Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Support dynamic resizing of vbds Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:47:40 +0000 Message-ID: <4BA73CBC0200007800036216@vpn.id2.novell.com> References: <4BA23895020000300008184F@sinclair.provo.novell.com> <4BA294A0.1010900@goop.org> <4BA244F50200003000081870@sinclair.provo.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4BA244F50200003000081870@sinclair.provo.novell.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ky Srinivasan Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Based on the location of the file patched, it this would seem to be=20 targeted at the 2.6.18 tree, but then 2.6.18 does not have a revalidate_disk() function (introduced only in .28). What's the deal here? Should this perhaps be carried out by open coding in blkfront what .28 does? Thanks, Jan >>> "Ky Srinivasan" 18.03.10 22:21 >>> >>> On 3/18/2010 at 5:01 PM, in message <4BA294A0.1010900@goop.org>, = Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:=20 > On 03/18/2010 01:28 PM, Ky Srinivasan wrote: >> The attached patch supports dynamic resizing of vbds. This patch fixes = a bug=20 > in the previous version of this patch that was sent out. With this patch = you=20 > can perform "online" resizing of file systems that support online = resizing. >> =20 >=20 > Please send a delta against the previous patch, since it has already=20 > been applied. I am attaching a new patch that is the delta on the previous one. Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan >=20 > J