From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jan Beulich" Subject: Re: [PATCH] libxc bitmap utils and vcpu-affinity Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:10:52 +0000 Message-ID: <4BA8A1BC0200007800036662@vpn.id2.novell.com> References: <940bcfd21003212033t3c3bf074h663337b56dd5954e@mail.gmail.com> <940bcfd21003221044l51b83de8sc1725fe531e5b642@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <940bcfd21003221044l51b83de8sc1725fe531e5b642@mail.gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Dulloor Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org >>> Dulloor 22.03.10 18:44 >>> >Motivation for using xenctl_cpumask in Xen interfaces : >- xenctl_cpumap is just 4 bytes smaller than static xenctl_cpumask for >128 cpus (128 would be good for quite some time). However, the new I don't buy this (we're already building for 256 CPUs, looking forward to further bump this in the not too distant future), and I'm generally opposed to introducing hard coded limits in a public interface. Jan