From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: xen/stable-2.6.32.x features / netchannel2 Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:56:53 -0700 Message-ID: <4BA8F2D5.2070506@goop.org> References: <20100304082731.GQ2761@reaktio.net> <4B8FFB5D.80803@goop.org> <20100323094916.GE1878@reaktio.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100323094916.GE1878@reaktio.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Pasi_K=E4rkk=E4inen?= Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Keir Fraser List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 03/23/2010 02:49 AM, Pasi K=E4rkk=E4inen wrote: > On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 10:26:37AM -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > =20 >> On 03/04/2010 12:27 AM, Pasi K=E4rkk=E4inen wrote: >> =20 >>> On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 04:57:42PM +0000, Keir Fraser wrote: >>> >>> =20 >>>> Folks, >>>> >>>> New release candidates are available: >>>> http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-3.4-testing.hg (tag 3.4.3-rc3) >>>> http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-unstable.hg (tag 4.0.0-rc5) >>>> >>>> Please test! I think both of these are pretty close to final now. >>>> >>>> >>>> =20 >>> Hello, >>> >>> Are you planning to switch the default in xen-unstable from 'xen/mast= er' >>> xen.git branch to xen/stable, or perhaps xen/stable-2.6.32.x ? >>> =20 >> I want to get ACPI power management into .32 before doing that, or we'= ll >> be dealing with lots of regression reports. >> >> =20 > Hello, > > I just noticed xen/stable-2.6.32.x doesn't have the netchannel2 stuff.. > Is netchannel2 ok quality for 2.6.32.x? > =20 To be honest, I was waiting to see if anyone noticed. I merged it in,=20 but I've never tested it myself, and I wasn't at all sure that anyone=20 had been using it. I could merge it in, but it is very far from being=20 upstreamable. J