From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Guillaume Rousse Subject: Re: Please test xen/stable-2.6.32.x in xen.git Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2010 18:53:12 +0200 Message-ID: <4BBA1578.6020604@inria.fr> References: <4BB38D30.3090100@goop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4BB38D30.3090100@goop.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Le 31/03/2010 19:58, Jeremy Fitzhardinge a =C3=A9crit : > Hi all, >=20 > If you haven't already, could you please test out the > xen/stable-2.6.32.x branch. It has been working fairly well for me, bu= t > I'd like to get some wider testing coverage before we make it the > default branch. >=20 > To switch over, cd into your kernel directory, and type "git checkout > xen/stable-2.6.32.x" and rebuild. It seems to works as a dom0 kernel, but it isn't a suitable xenlinux tree for building pv-on-hvm drivers, as doesn't contains the files expected by mkbuildtree script (scrub.c, notably). --=20 BOFH excuse #341: HTTPD Error 666 : BOFH was here