From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: [PATCH 6 of 6] PV on HVM suspend\resume Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 12:03:11 -0700 Message-ID: <4BD5E36F.80204@goop.org> References: <4BD22888.1060305@goop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Stefano Stabellini Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Ian Campbell List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 04/25/2010 04:25 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: >> This won't compile with CONFIG_PREEMPT enabled, because out_destroy_sm >> is missing below. >> >> > > Now it is fixed, Did you push out the fix (ideally as a new delta changeset on top of the previous ones, rather than rebaseing them). > however I tried suspend/resume with CONFIG_PREEMPT > enabled and the kernel seems to hang at resume time; I wonder if it > works for pv guests since the suspend/resume code is similiar... > I think Pasi and IanC tested it quite a bit not too long ago, but its possible they didn't test preempt kernels (and it wouldn't surprise me at all if preempt breaks things). Thanks, J