From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jan Beulich" Subject: Re: RE: [PATCH] x86: add CMCI software injection interface Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 08:46:22 +0100 Message-ID: <4BE13E6E020000780000157E@vpn.id2.novell.com> References: <789F9655DD1B8F43B48D77C5D30659731D8B3C40@shsmsx501.ccr.corp.intel.com> <789F9655DD1B8F43B48D77C5D30659731E41783E@shsmsx501.ccr.corp.intel.com> <4BE0EB6B.6090804@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4BE0EB6B.6090804@oracle.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Frank Van Der Linden Cc: Egger , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , "gavin.maltby@oracle.com" , Yunhong Jiang , Liping Ke , Christoph@rcsinet11.oracle.com, Keir Fraser List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org >>> Frank Van Der Linden 05.05.10 05:52 = >>> >I have no problems with this change. dom0/Xen should match in version=20 >anyway. There have been ABI breakages in the dom0/Xen interface before.=20= When was it that you last saw an incompatible change to the interface? There shouldn't be a need to match up Dom0 and Xen versions, except when you want support for newly added features. Jan