From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: George Dunlap Subject: Re: So I tried to use xentrace... Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 13:56:31 -0500 Message-ID: <4BE9A85F.10004@eu.citrix.com> References: <4BDB4CCC.3080405@goop.org> <4BE47F26.50904@goop.org> <4BE48332.6040209@eu.citrix.com> <4BE4F088.8040008@goop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4BE4F088.8040008@goop.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Cc: Xen-devel , Keir Fraser List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Yes, it does. But I'm seeing some pretty odd things while xentrace is > running: first time all my SATA drives stopped responding, and the > second time my ethernet device started getting tx watchdog timeouts. > Perhaps the large amount of IO caused by xentrace is causing other bugs > to become apparent, but this has been an otherwise very stable system... > That is a bit weird. None of my test machines have had that problem (probably 3-4 different varieties), and our automated testing infrastructure for the upcoming release hasn't complained so far. Let me know if you find out anything, and I'll keep an eye out for any weirdness on my systems. -George