From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jan Beulich" Subject: Re: increase evtchn limits Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 11:52:25 +0100 Message-ID: <4BF6820902000078000037AB@vpn.id2.novell.com> References: <4BF64EDA020000780005E1FE@vpn.id2.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Keir Fraser , "mukesh.rathor@oracle.com" Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org >>> On 21.05.10 at 11:25, Keir Fraser wrote: > Has the event channel limit *actually* been hit? Or is this another = "what if > we had over a thousand CPUs" scenario? I haven't seen it hit, I've seen the dump from a box with about 1000 of them in use (and there not having been many guests). So this is more of a "let's think in time about the not too far future" consideration.= Jan