From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@novell.com>
To: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>,
Cris Daniluk <cris.daniluk@gmail.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: Xen 4.0 crashes with pvops kernel
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 14:20:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C179A47020000780000683A@vpn.id2.novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C83D3707.178AF%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
>>> On 15.06.10 at 14:56, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
> On 15/06/2010 13:50, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@novell.com> wrote:
>
>> But even if we verify that the references come from some ACPI
>> method(s), likely the only way to address this is to fix the kernel
>> side error handling.
>>
>> Keir, assuming these are reads only, would it make sense to permit
>> Dom0 to map the IO-APIC space read-only? Perhaps even
>> transparently converting writeable mappings to read-only ones
>> (since drivers/acpi/osl.c tries to establish writeable mappings
>> irrespective of the actual needs)? The obvious danger in doing
>> so is that going forward there may appear fields in that page
>> reads of which aren't side effect free...
>
> Well, how come it works with other Linux kernels -- presumably they have
> some extra error handling in the ACPI subsystem? Shouldn't that just be
> added to this kernel?
I'm rather suspecting there's new code (compared to 2.6.18) that's
lacking proper error handling, though I didn't look in detail so far.
Hmm, looking a little more closely it seems they indeed try to write
to that space - this we for sure can't allow. I'll see if I can follow
the code path (unfortunately the stack trace is an imprecise one).
Cris, seeing DSDT and SSDTs from that system would surely be
helpful.
Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-15 13:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-14 22:10 Xen 4.0 crashes with pvops kernel Cris Daniluk
2010-06-15 6:54 ` Jan Beulich
[not found] ` <AANLkTimslcbXQnihpIB0c-ceWbD7H-eyUY_BV2igyfzv@mail.gmail.com>
2010-06-15 12:50 ` Jan Beulich
2010-06-15 12:56 ` Keir Fraser
2010-06-15 13:20 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2010-06-15 13:24 ` Cris Daniluk
2010-06-15 13:43 ` Jan Beulich
2010-06-15 13:49 ` Cris Daniluk
2010-06-15 14:13 ` Jan Beulich
2010-06-15 14:35 ` Cris Daniluk
2010-06-15 14:58 ` Jan Beulich
2010-06-15 15:01 ` Cris Daniluk
2010-06-15 15:21 ` Jan Beulich
2010-06-15 16:18 ` Boris Derzhavets
2010-06-15 14:17 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-06-15 15:11 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-06-16 14:42 ` Jan Beulich
2010-06-15 13:57 ` Jan Beulich
2010-06-15 15:15 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-06-16 14:36 ` Jan Beulich
2010-06-24 9:29 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-06-24 11:30 ` Jan Beulich
2010-06-24 21:25 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C179A47020000780000683A@vpn.id2.novell.com \
--to=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=cris.daniluk@gmail.com \
--cc=keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).