From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michal Novotny Subject: Re: Re: Xen-unstable save error Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 16:09:18 +0200 Message-ID: <4C1F728E.8070209@redhat.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Keir Fraser Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 06/21/2010 04:06 PM, Keir Fraser wrote: > On 21/06/2010 15:02, "Michal Novotny" wrote: > > >> Ok Keir, but what I don't understand is why there's nothing in >> `/local/domain/%d/device/suspend/event-channel`. So this is OK? >> > Yes that's okay. The guest writes that location only If it supports the new > event-channel notification method for suspend. > > >> For the restore functionality: >> >> # ls -ahl rhel5-32fv.sav >> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 53M Jun 21 2010 rhel5-32fv.sav >> > Okay, yeah, if the guest really has 1G of memory allocated to it at the time > of the save, then something has gone wrong on the save side. But no errors > were apparent on the save side, apart from that event-channel port warning > which is benign? That's weird. > > -- Keir > > > Exactly Keir. Nothing wrong there except the event-channel port missing warning. So this is something strange I guess. Well, I'll try to investigate this further then. Michal -- Michal Novotny, RHCE Virtualization Team (xen userspace), Red Hat