From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Haxby Subject: Re: pvfb: Absolute vs relative mouse tracking mystery Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 15:57:08 +0100 Message-ID: <4C1F7DC4.3090706@oracle.com> References: <4BE49501.6000408@goop.org> <4BE86945.9050408@goop.org> <20100619154145.GM17817@reaktio.net> <4C1CE6DE.8000602@goop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4C1CE6DE.8000602@goop.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Cc: Xen-devel , Stefano Stabellini List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 19/06/10 16:48, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Yes, that should be fixed in current xen-unstable - it was a xenbus > race-condition. What guest are you seeing it in? I've found that I > still don't get absolute pointers in Centos guests. > > Do you know what the changeset it? This has been bugging me for a while -- every now and again (just to taunt me) I get an absolute pointer. BTW, RHEL5 does some strange stuff to force relative pointers which seems crazy to me. jch