From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jan Beulich" Subject: Re: Udev or XEN bug? Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 15:52:55 +0100 Message-ID: <4C1F98E70200007800007666@vpn.id2.novell.com> References: <20100619T1845.GA.34690.stse@fsing.rootsland.net> <20100620090524.GY17817@reaktio.net> <4C1F3966.3050804@goop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4C1F3966.3050804@goop.org> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge , pasik@iki.fi Cc: Bastian Blank , James Harper , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Aleksi Suhonen List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org >>> On 21.06.10 at 12:05, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Jan, do you have a patch which implements your suggestions? Not for the pv-ops tree - in our tree, the fix logically belongs into the 2.6.22 up-merge of the Xen patches, but that wouldn't even come close to applying to the pv-ops (or other newer) trees, due to other subsequent infrastructure changes. I could try to put something together, but that would be untested... Jan