From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michal Novotny Subject: Re: Re: Xen-unstable save error Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 12:53:58 +0200 Message-ID: <4C209646.4060401@redhat.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Keir Fraser Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Jan Beulich List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 06/22/2010 12:23 PM, Keir Fraser wrote: > On 22/06/2010 11:05, "Michal Novotny" wrote: > > >>> Michal, is it possible you are running new tools against a slightly older >>> hypervisor? The tools changes had a corresponding, non-version-checked, >>> modification to a hypercall. Without running the modified hypervisor, HVM >>> save would indeed behave very oddly! >>> >>> >> Keir, I don't think so since the hypervisor datetime in /boot is the >> same like for kernel and tools. >> > Well, it remains something to doublecheck at least. There's no good reason > that HVM save should work okay for everyone else and only fail so miserably > for you. > > -- Keir > > > I don't know but I'll investigate it further but it's working with the patch 21615 patch reverted. Maybe something's wrong with my test setup. Some further investigation is necessary. Michal -- Michal Novotny, RHCE Virtualization Team (xen userspace), Red Hat