From: Michal Novotny <minovotn@redhat.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix restore handling checks
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 13:27:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C21EFBF.1010702@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100622141039.GA4552@phenom.dumpdata.com>
On 06/22/2010 04:10 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 02:56:24PM +0200, Michal Novotny wrote:
>
>> On 06/22/2010 08:17 AM, Michal Novotny wrote:
>>
>>> On 06/22/2010 08:14 AM, Keir Fraser wrote:
>>>
>>>> Okay, hopefully someone will be able to Ack this patch with
>>>> better knwoledge
>>>> of xend than me.
>>>>
>>>> -- Keir
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Ok, good. If it will be accepted and put into
>>> xen-staging/xen-unstable tree please let me know about it.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Michal
>>>
>>>
>> Well, this is new version of the patch since I've tried now to both
>> migrate from RHEL-5 host (python-2.4) to RHEL-6 host (python-2.6)
>> using the RHEL-5 host as a source machine for migrations and also
>> RHEL-6 host to restore the the guest locally using `xm restore` to
>> see whether the guest memory calculated correctly and it did pass
>> when there was enough memory to create the guest and failed when
>> there was not enough memory to create the guest. Also, some fixing
>> for comparing the values was necessary since it was treated as
>> string comparison on one of the hosts.
>>
>> Both the host machines were having the latest Xen-4.1 installed.
>>
>> Michal
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michal Novotny<minovotn@redhat.com>
>>
>> --
>> Michal Novotny<minovotn@redhat.com>, RHCE
>> Virtualization Team (xen userspace), Red Hat
>>
>>
>
>> diff -r a24dbfcbdf69 tools/python/xen/xend/XendCheckpoint.py
>> --- a/tools/python/xen/xend/XendCheckpoint.py Tue Jun 22 07:19:38 2010 +0100
>> +++ b/tools/python/xen/xend/XendCheckpoint.py Tue Jun 22 12:52:56 2010 +0200
>> @@ -64,6 +64,78 @@ def insert_after(list, pred, value):
>> list.insert (i+1, value)
>> return
>>
>> +def get_avail_memory():
>> + """Get available memory for new guest creation (in KiB, for restore)"""
>> + from xen.xend import XendOptions
>> +
>> + # First get total memory in KiB
>> + xc = xen.lowlevel.xc.xc()
>> + info = xc.domain_getinfo()
>> + total_mem = xc.physinfo()['total_memory']
>> + del xc
>> +
>> + # Count memory of all running guests in KiB
>> + mem_used = 0L
>> + for x in info:
>> + if x['domid'] != 0:
>> + # If blocked& paused& !paused& no online_vcpus we most
>> + # probably migrate so we get maxmem instead (since mem_kb
>> + # is having currently transferred amount of memory so we
>> + # cannot use it for good calculations)
>> + if (x['blocked'] == 1 and x['paused'] == 1 and
>> + x['running'] == 0 and x['online_vcpus'] == 0):
>> + log.debug("Domain %d seems to be restoring" % x['domid'])
>> + mem_used += x['maxmem_kb']
>> + else:
>> + mem_used += x['mem_kb']
>> +
>> + # Get minimal memory for dom0 and convert to KiB
>> + min_mem = XendOptions.instance().get_dom0_min_mem() * 1024
>> +
>> + return total_mem - mem_used - min_mem
>> +
>> +def check_for_restore_bail(msg):
>> + raise VmError("Cannot restore: %s" % msg)
>> +
>> +def check_for_enough_mem(val):
>> + mem_avail = get_avail_memory() / 1024
>> + log.debug("Available memory: %s MiB, guest requires: %s MiB" % (mem_avail, val))
>> + return int(mem_avail)> int(val)
>> +
>> +def check_for_restore_is_hvm(cfg):
>> + for item in cfg:
>> + if (type(item) == list):
>> + if item[0] == 'image':
>> + return type(item[1]) == list and item[1][0] == 'hvm'
>>
> There is no chance that 'hvm' would be in different case? Say 'HVM' ?
>
According to my testing it's always lowercase here and maybe everything
on the SXP is lowercase. Nevertheless I am not sure about everything but
what I'm sure is that the hvm is *always* lowercase.
>> +
>> +def check_for_restore_hvm_have_readonly_ide(cfg):
>> + """Check the configuration for read-only IDE devices
>> + Fail if such a device is found."""
>> + disallow = None
>> + if type(cfg) == list and cfg[0] in ('tap', 'vbd'):
>> + for p in cfg:
>> + if (type(p) != str):
>>
> Is that right? should it not == list ?
>
It's been tested and working fine. There are no more options than 'list'
and 'str' so in fact this is the same to implement it like 'if .. !=
str' and 'if ... == list'.
>> + if p[0] == 'dev':
>> + disallow = ((p[1].find('hd')>= 0) and
>> + (p[1].find('cdrom') == -1))
>> + if p[0] == 'mode' and disallow:
>> + if p[1] == 'r':
>> + return True
>> + return False
>> +
>> +def check_for_restore(cfg):
>> + is_hvm = check_for_restore_is_hvm(cfg)
>> + name = None
>> + for item in cfg:
>> + if (type(item) == list):
>> + # Check for enough memory to create the guest
>> + if item[0] == 'memory':
>> + if not check_for_enough_mem(item[1]):
>> + check_for_restore_bail('Host machine doesn\'t have enough memory to create the guest')
>> + # We disable read-only IDE drives only for HVM guests
>> + if item[0] == 'device' and is_hvm:
>> + if check_for_restore_hvm_have_readonly_ide(item[1]):
>> + check_for_restore_bail('HVM domains cannot be using read-only IDE drives')
>>
>> def save(fd, dominfo, network, live, dst, checkpoint=False, node=-1):
>> from xen.xend import XendDomain
>> @@ -220,6 +292,7 @@ def restore(xd, fd, dominfo = None, paus
>> othervm = xd.domain_lookup_nr(domconfig["uuid"])
>> if othervm is not None and othervm.domid is not None:
>> raise VmError("Domain '%s' already exists with ID '%d'" % (domconfig["name_label"], othervm.domid))
>> + check_for_restore(vmconfig)
>>
>> if dominfo:
>> dominfo.resume()
>> diff -r a24dbfcbdf69 tools/python/xen/xend/XendDomainInfo.py
>> --- a/tools/python/xen/xend/XendDomainInfo.py Tue Jun 22 07:19:38 2010 +0100
>> +++ b/tools/python/xen/xend/XendDomainInfo.py Tue Jun 22 12:52:56 2010 +0200
>> @@ -82,6 +82,32 @@ log = logging.getLogger("xend.XendDomain
>> log = logging.getLogger("xend.XendDomainInfo")
>> #log.setLevel(logging.TRACE)
>>
>> +def cfg_is_hvm(cfg):
>> + for item in cfg:
>> + if (type(item) == list):
>> + if item[0] == 'image':
>> + return type(item[1]) == list and item[1][0] == 'hvm'
>> +
>> +def cfg_hvm_have_readonly_ide_disks(cfg):
>> + """Check whether the configuration for read-only IDE disks since
>> + they are not supported according to IDE specifications."""
>> + if not cfg_is_hvm(cfg):
>> + return False
>> +
>> + disallow = None
>> + for item in cfg:
>> + if (type(item) == list):
>> + if item[0] == 'device':
>> + if type(item[1]) == list and item[1][0] in ('tap', 'vbd'):
>> + for p in item[1]:
>> + if (type(p) != str):
>> + if p[0] == 'dev':
>> + disallow = ((p[1].find('hd')>= 0) and
>> + (p[1].find('cdrom') == -1))
>> + if p[0] == 'mode' and disallow:
>> + if p[1] == 'r':
>> + return True
>> + return False
>>
>> def create(config):
>> """Creates and start a VM using the supplied configuration.
>> @@ -100,6 +126,10 @@ def create(config):
>> othervm = XendDomain.instance().domain_lookup_nr(domconfig["uuid"])
>> if othervm is not None and othervm.domid is not None:
>> raise VmError("Domain '%s' already exists with ID '%d'" % (domconfig["name_label"], othervm.domid))
>> +
>> + if cfg_hvm_have_readonly_ide_disks(config):
>> + raise VmError("HVM domains cannot be using read-only IDE drives")
>> +
>> log.debug("XendDomainInfo.create(%s)", scrub_password(config))
>> vm = XendDomainInfo(domconfig)
>> try:
>>
> Otherwise looks good to me.
>
Good, thanks for review.
Michal
--
Michal Novotny<minovotn@redhat.com>, RHCE
Virtualization Team (xen userspace), Red Hat
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-23 11:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-21 16:30 [PATCH] Fix restore handling checks Michal Novotny
2010-06-21 18:04 ` Keir Fraser
2010-06-22 5:43 ` Michal Novotny
2010-06-22 6:11 ` Michal Novotny
2010-06-22 6:14 ` Keir Fraser
2010-06-22 6:17 ` Michal Novotny
2010-06-22 12:56 ` Michal Novotny
2010-06-22 14:10 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-06-23 11:27 ` Michal Novotny [this message]
2010-06-22 20:46 ` Dan Magenheimer
2010-06-23 9:59 ` Michal Novotny
2010-06-23 11:21 ` Michal Novotny
2010-06-23 13:51 ` Dan Magenheimer
2010-06-23 14:14 ` Michal Novotny
2010-06-22 14:56 ` Ian Jackson
2010-06-23 11:19 ` Paolo Bonzini
2010-06-23 11:27 ` Ian Jackson
2010-06-23 11:29 ` Michal Novotny
2010-06-23 11:50 ` Ian Jackson
2010-06-23 11:54 ` Michal Novotny
2010-06-23 12:04 ` Ian Jackson
2010-06-23 12:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
2010-06-23 12:20 ` Michal Novotny
2010-06-23 12:20 ` Michal Novotny
2010-06-23 12:12 ` Michal Novotny
2010-06-23 12:33 ` Alan Cox
2010-06-23 15:12 ` George Dunlap
2010-06-23 16:26 ` Dan Magenheimer
2010-06-23 12:35 ` Alan Cox
2010-06-23 12:37 ` Michal Novotny
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C21EFBF.1010702@redhat.com \
--to=minovotn@redhat.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).