From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Vincent Hanquez <vincent.hanquez@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libxl: make libxl_wait_for_device_model not
	racy
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 14:36:11 +0100
Message-ID: <4C220DCB.8000600@eu.citrix.com>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1006231059110.22638@kaball-desktop>
	<4C21EF38.10504@eu.citrix.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1006231409180.22638@kaball-desktop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1006231409180.22638@kaball-desktop>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 23/06/10 14:15, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> No, it was just refactoring.
>
> Are you sure that both xenstore implementations always do that?
>    
yes.

> Is this a "feature" we can safely rely on?
>    
yes. this feature has been here since xenstore has watches, for this 
exact purpose: not having to check before the watch fire that the values 
you're expecting is there already.

-- 
Vincent