From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@novell.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
Joanna Rutkowska <joanna@invisiblethingslab.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Re: Re: DomU lockups after resume from S3 on Core i5 processors
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 09:41:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C33085E0200007800009AE1@vpn.id2.novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C3267FB.3070202@goop.org>
>>> On 06.07.10 at 01:17, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:
> On 07/05/2010 03:52 PM, Joanna Rutkowska wrote:
>> On 07/06/10 00:43, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>>> Do you know what's going on it in that it might be waiting
>>> for?
>>>
>> No idea. I might be guessing that it would be different kernel
>> subsystems each time -- e.g. when I'm lucky and when the apps got only
>> "partially" locked up, I can e.g. open new tabs in Google Chrome, I can
>> see some thumbnails of my popular websites, but without their contents.
>> This would suggest the networking subsystem is dead, but at the same
>> time Chrome is apparently communicating fine with the X server in the
>> DomU (and which in turn talks fine with Dom0 over Xen shared
>> memory/evtchanl).
>>
>> I experienced the above behavior also when had only one VCPU er DomU.
>>
>
> I've seen similar things with just normal domain save/restore, where the
> timer interrupt seems to be failing. Can you ssh into the domain? I
> found that I couldn't do an interactive ssh (hung at the prompt), but a
> non-interactive command would work, so I could cat /proc/interrupts.
Did either of you try disabling the setting of sched_clock_stable in
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c:early_init_intel()? I found this to be a
requirement in our pv kernels (though in connection with the use of
C-states, not with S3).
Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-06 8:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-05 10:38 DomU lockups after resume from S3 on Core i5 processors Joanna Rutkowska
2010-07-05 21:28 ` Joanna Rutkowska
2010-07-05 22:07 ` Joanna Rutkowska
2010-07-05 22:43 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-07-05 22:52 ` Joanna Rutkowska
2010-07-05 23:17 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-07-06 8:41 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2010-07-06 8:59 ` Joanna Rutkowska
2010-07-06 9:57 ` Jan Beulich
2010-07-08 14:04 ` Joanna Rutkowska
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C33085E0200007800009AE1@vpn.id2.novell.com \
--to=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=joanna@invisiblethingslab.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).