xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@novell.com>
To: Joanna Rutkowska <joanna@invisiblethingslab.com>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Re: Re: DomU lockups after resume from S3 on Core i5 processors
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 10:57:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C331A3E0200007800009B3A@vpn.id2.novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C32F078.2080009@invisiblethingslab.com>

>>> On 06.07.10 at 10:59, Joanna Rutkowska <joanna@invisiblethingslab.com> wrote:
> On 07/06/10 10:41, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Did either of you try disabling the setting of sched_clock_stable in
>> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c:early_init_intel()? I found this to be a
>> requirement in our pv kernels (though in connection with the use of
>> C-states, not with S3).
>> 
> Before I try it -- can you explain what would be the theory behind it,
> specifically how this would be related to HT? Clearly it is a HT
> problem, and intuitively, I would expect this to be a Xen-side problem,
> rather than DomU-side?

The HT connection is only a vague one, as Jeremy also hinted at in
his reply. The issue is that with sched_clock_stable set,
sched_clock_cpu() (and cpu_clock()) gets short cut to sched_clock(),
hence becoming susceptible to eventual non-monotonic behavior of
that function.

In any case, it's a wild guess only, attributed to the partially-hung
observations you made matching my observations (on new Intel
CPUs only) prior to addressing this issue.

Jan

  reply	other threads:[~2010-07-06  9:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-05 10:38 DomU lockups after resume from S3 on Core i5 processors Joanna Rutkowska
2010-07-05 21:28 ` Joanna Rutkowska
2010-07-05 22:07   ` Joanna Rutkowska
2010-07-05 22:43     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-07-05 22:52       ` Joanna Rutkowska
2010-07-05 23:17         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-07-06  8:41           ` Jan Beulich
2010-07-06  8:59             ` Joanna Rutkowska
2010-07-06  9:57               ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2010-07-08 14:04     ` Joanna Rutkowska

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C331A3E0200007800009B3A@vpn.id2.novell.com \
    --to=jbeulich@novell.com \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=joanna@invisiblethingslab.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).