From: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
To: Thomas Graves <tgraves@yahoo-inc.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: Xenalyze?
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 12:04:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C37023D.8010201@eu.citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C85BB686.56845%tgraves@yahoo-inc.com>
OK, I unified all of the p->current checks, so all of them only issue a
warning and skip that record. Try it now.
On my to-do list is to add a lamport clock to the runstate change trace
records. Hopefully that will solve the intractable TSC drift problems
once and for all.
-George
On 08/07/10 23:08, Thomas Graves wrote:
> Thanks for the updates. It ran a lot longer then before but it still
> ended up failing. I’ll try truncating the file and a few other things.
> Let me know if you have any other ideas.
>
>
> runstate_change old_runstate runnable, d1402v0 runstate blocked.
> Possible tsc skew.
> runstate_change old_runstate runnable, d1402v0 runstate blocked.
> Possible tsc skew.
> runstate_change old_runstate runnable, d1402v0 runstate blocked.
> Possible tsc skew.
> runstate_change old_runstate runnable, d1402v0 runstate blocked.
> Possible tsc skew.
> runstate_change old_runstate runnable, d1402v0 runstate blocked.
> Possible tsc skew.
> runstate_change old_runstate runnable, d1402v0 runstate blocked.
> Possible tsc skew.
> runstate_change old_runstate runnable, d1402v0 runstate blocked.
> Possible tsc skew.
> runstate_change old_runstate runnable, d1402v0 runstate blocked.
> Possible tsc skew.
> runstate_change old_runstate runnable, d1402v0 runstate blocked.
> Possible tsc skew.
> runstate_change old_runstate blocked, d1402v0 runstate runnable.
> Possible tsc skew.
> runstate_change old_runstate blocked, d1402v0 runstate runnable.
> Possible tsc skew.
> runstate_change old_runstate runnable, d1402v0 runstate running.
> Possible tsc skew.
> Not updating.
> FATAL: p->current null
> ] 20f101(20:f:101) 3 [ 802061ea ffffffff f ]
>
>
> Tom
>
>
> On 7/8/10 11:36 AM, "George Dunlap" <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
>
> I had a work-around for the problem in a local patch-queue somewhere.
> I've pushed it (along with a bunch of local stuff I had lying around
> ) -- do a pull and let me know if it works better.
>
> -George
>
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Thomas Graves
> <tgraves@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
> >
> > -bash-3.2$ hg id
> > 503e0902a86a+ tip
> > -bash-3.2$ hg parents
> > changeset: 49:503e0902a86a
> > tag: tip
> > user: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
> > date: Tue Jun 22 17:11:51 2010 +0100
> > summary: More xenalyze type fixes
> >
> > I’m using a clone of http://xenbits.xensource.com/ext/xenalyze.hg
> and then
> > patched with the patch -p1 < back-patches/3.4.diff and make on
> rhel5.4.
> >
> > Let me know if you
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Tom
> >
> >
> > On 7/8/10 9:24 AM, "George Dunlap" <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > The file length itself probably isn't that important, but rather the
> > fact that longer trace files increase the opportunity for certain
> > kinds of probabilistic problematic events to occur.
> >
> > The problem here looks like a problem with TSC skew -- xenalyze is
> > having trouble figuring out how to process the records in the right
> > order because of drift in the TSC value across cores (that's what the
> > "Possible tsc skew" messages are about), and end up breaking an
> > assumption because it's failing (hence the "FATAL: p->current = NULL"
> > message) .
> >
> > Can you give me the cs of the tip of your hg tree? I'll take a look
> > and see if I have a local fix.
> >
> > -George
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Thomas Graves
> <tgraves@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I'm new to using xentrace and xenalyze and I am having problems
> running
> > > xenalyze on a large trace file. It is always giving me a fatal
> error. If I
> > > run it on like a 30 second trace it seems to work fine.
> > >
> > > Is this a known issue or am I possibly doing something wrong? Do you
> > > think
> > > it would work if I truncate the file or would it be missing stuff
> xenalyze
> > > expects? If there is no way to truncate it perhaps I'll see if I can
> > > modify it to only show me certain time frame - I haven't looked
> at the
> > > code
> > > yet so I guess I'll have to see if that is possible.
> > >
> > > I'm using xen3.4.3 with rhel5.4 dom0 running a rhel5.4 vm.
> > >
> > > I'm trying to debug a vm hang at boot which sporadically occurs
> so I just
> > > have trace running while I do a bunch of creates and deletes so
> the trace
> > > file gets fairly large. If you have other ideas what might work
> better I
> > > would be interested in hearing them.
> > >
> > >
> > > -------
> > > -bash-3.2$ ls -la trace.raw
> > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 13238044416 Jul 7 23:02 trace.raw
> > > -bash-3.2$ xenalyze/xenalyze --cpu-hz=2.43G --summary trace.raw > out
> > >
> > > -------
> > > ..
> > > ..
> > > ..
> > > ..
> > > runstate_change old_runstate blocked, d1402v0 runstate runnable.
> Possible
> > > tsc skew.
> > > runstate_change old_runstate blocked, d1402v0 runstate runnable.
> Possible
> > > tsc skew.
> > > runstate_change old_runstate runnable, d1402v0 runstate running.
> Possible
> > > tsc skew.
> > > Not updating.
> > > FATAL: p->current null
> > > ] 20f101(20:f:101) 3 [ 802061ea ffffffff f ]
> > > -----
> > >
> > >
> > > Any help is appreciated,
> > > Thanks,
> > > Tom Graves
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Xen-devel mailing list
> > > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> > > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-devel mailing list
> > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-09 11:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-08 14:09 Xenalyze? Thomas Graves
2010-07-08 14:24 ` Xenalyze? George Dunlap
2010-07-08 14:46 ` Xenalyze? Thomas Graves
2010-07-08 16:36 ` Xenalyze? George Dunlap
2010-07-08 22:08 ` Xenalyze? Thomas Graves
2010-07-09 11:04 ` George Dunlap [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C37023D.8010201@eu.citrix.com \
--to=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=tgraves@yahoo-inc.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).