From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jan Beulich" Subject: Re: xenpm: provide core/package cstate residencies Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 12:26:57 +0100 Message-ID: <4C3B1821020000780000ABBC@vpn.id2.novell.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Gang Wei Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Keir Fraser List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org >>> On 12.07.10 at 13:03, "Wei, Gang" wrote: > @@ -113,6 +162,7 @@ static void print_acpi_power(uint32_t cp > printk(" C0:\tusage[%08d] duration[%"PRId64"]\n", > idle_usage, NOW() - idle_res); > =20 > + print_hw_residencies(cpu); Isn't this resulting in a set of unconditional rdmsr-s on possibly unimplemented MSRs? Jan