From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HVM guests are allowed to use the entire
 virtual address space for
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 11:52:30 +0200
Message-ID: <4C4D5ADE.2050405@redhat.com>
References: <0b3b2b31e962561390ca.1274798999@waitaha.uk.xensource.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <0b3b2b31e962561390ca.1274798999@waitaha.uk.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 05/25/2010 04:49 PM, Tim Deegan wrote:
> whatever they want, without any Xen hole.  __addr_ok() is therefore
> always true for such guests.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@citrix.com>

Sorry for picking up yet another old patch after two months. :)

Do you have a testcase for this or the other patch in the thread?

Paolo