From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@novell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] xenoprofile: Add IBS support
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 12:41:11 +0100
Message-ID: <4C600577020000780000ED13@vpn.id2.novell.com>
References: <201007301528.41379.wei.wang2@amd.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <201007301528.41379.wei.wang2@amd.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Wei Wang2 <wei.wang2@amd.com>, "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

>>> On 30.07.10 at 15:28, Wei Wang2 <wei.wang2@amd.com> wrote:
>--- a/drivers/oprofile/oprofile_files.c
>+++ b/drivers/oprofile/oprofile_files.c
>@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
> #include "oprof.h"
>=20
> unsigned long fs_buffer_size =3D 131072;
>-unsigned long fs_cpu_buffer_size =3D 8192;
>+unsigned long fs_cpu_buffer_size =3D 131072;

Why is this needed at all, why this much of an increase, and why not
conditional upon CONFIG_XEN?

Jan