From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Weidong Han Subject: Re: RE: xl fails to work with some command Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 08:30:08 +0800 Message-ID: <4C770710.1040604@intel.com> References: <749B9D3DBF0F054390025D9EAFF47F222A060143@shsmsx501.ccr.corp.intel.com> <749B9D3DBF0F054390025D9EAFF47F222A060CFB@shsmsx501.ccr.corp.intel.com> <749B9D3DBF0F054390025D9EAFF47F222A060E65@shsmsx501.ccr.corp.intel.com> <4C760542.7080003@intel.com> <20100826135017.GA3792@phenom.dumpdata.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Stefano Stabellini Cc: "Zhang, Yang Z" , Ian Campbell , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Thu, 26 Aug 2010, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 01:17:08PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 26 Aug 2010, Weidong Han wrote: >>> >>>> Stefano Stabellini wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Zhang, Yang Z wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> 6. vcpu-set is not supported by xl. So some RAS case which use xl vcpu-set >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> to set guest's cpu set will fails. case "vcpu_hot_add_64_g32e" fails. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> actually vcpu-set is supported by xl, have you found any bugs using it? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> For pv guest, it work well. But for HVM guest, xl miss some function about cpu hotplug which was added recently. >>>>>> >>>>>> xl seems only support FLR and didn't support Second Bus Reset and D0/D3. Will you add them in xl? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> xl uses the sysfs "reset" node provided by the pci subsystem of the >>>>> Linux kernel, that should support Secondary Bus Reset and D0/D3 already. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Do you mean xl uses Linux kernel PCI API (i.e. pci_reset_function) to >>>> reset PCI device? >>>> >>> Yes, give a look at libxl_device_pci_reset: first libxl tries to use the >>> pciback sysfn node "do_flr", but if it is not present it will use the >>> standard linux sysfs "reset" node. >>> Please note that on pvops kernels the do_flr node is not present (but it >>> is present on both XCP and XCI kernels) while the reset node points to >>> pci_reset_function. >>> >> I am all up for receiving the patches from XCP/XCI for this >> >> > > I think that using the standard linux reset mechanism is a better way to > handle this as oppose to have our own do_flr method. > Pls note that there are some specific FLR functions for graphics pass-through. They should be ported to xl. Regards, Weidong