From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@novell.com>
To: Carsten Schiers <carsten@schiers.de>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Re: Xen BUG in mm / Xen 4.0.1 with 2.6.32.18/21 pvops Kernel?
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 13:51:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C87A2E60200007800014ED5@vpn.id2.novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8938594.271283948103002.JavaMail.root@uhura>
>>> On 08.09.10 at 14:15, Carsten Schiers <carsten@schiers.de> wrote:
> (XEN) mm.c:860:d0 Error getting mfn 80000 (pfn 5555555555555555) from L1
> entry 8000000080000473 for l1e_owner=0, pg_owner=32753
DOMID_IO seen here generally means that Dom0 tried to map a page
it doesn't own (likely because of your use of dom0_mem=). As the
page really is a RAM one, Xen doesn't allow the access. Given that
this apparently happens in the context of
acpi_ex_system_memory_space_handler() you'd have to look at (or
provide) your DSDT and SSDT(s) to see where this reference comes
from. Very likely this is just a bogus reference, that you get away
with on native, perhaps because this code in ioremap.c
last_pfn = last_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT;
for (pfn = phys_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT; pfn <= last_pfn; pfn++) {
int is_ram = page_is_ram(pfn);
if (is_ram && pfn_valid(pfn) && !PageReserved(pfn_to_page(pfn)))
return NULL;
WARN_ON_ONCE(is_ram);
}
should result in returning NULL there, while it wouldn't cover the
situation under Xen. (While the code is meaningless under Xen in
its current shape anyway, using dom0_mem= with a value above
2G should get you around the issue, as then PFN 0x80000 would
be considered RAM there too.)
Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-08 12:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-08 12:15 Xen BUG in mm / Xen 4.0.1 with 2.6.32.18/21 pvops Kernel? Carsten Schiers
2010-09-08 12:51 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2010-09-08 20:15 ` AW: " Carsten Schiers
2010-09-09 9:57 ` Jan Beulich
2010-09-09 18:27 ` Carsten Schiers
2010-09-09 18:40 ` Carsten Schiers
2010-09-09 19:04 ` Carsten Schiers
2010-09-10 8:22 ` Jan Beulich
2010-09-10 8:45 ` Jan Beulich
2010-09-14 9:10 ` Carsten Schiers
2010-09-14 9:33 ` Jan Beulich
2010-09-14 21:19 ` AW: Re: ACPI problem, was " Carsten Schiers
2010-09-14 22:05 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-09-15 1:20 ` Yu, Ke
2010-09-15 2:02 ` Wang, Winston L
2010-09-15 5:37 ` Jiang, Yunhong
2010-09-15 7:22 ` AW: " Carsten Schiers
2010-09-15 7:38 ` Jiang, Yunhong
2010-09-15 8:15 ` AW: " Jan Beulich
2010-09-15 8:28 ` Carsten Schiers
2010-09-15 8:36 ` Jiang, Yunhong
2010-09-15 8:50 ` Jiang, Yunhong
2010-10-19 9:59 ` 2.6.34.7 with SUSE patches: Invalid Kernel Carsten Schiers
2010-10-20 16:54 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-09-15 17:01 ` AW: Re: ACPI problem, was Xen BUG in mm / Xen 4.0.1 with 2.6.32.18/21 pvops Kernel? Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-09-10 8:48 ` AW: " Jan Beulich
2010-09-08 20:16 ` Carsten Schiers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C87A2E60200007800014ED5@vpn.id2.novell.com \
--to=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=carsten@schiers.de \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).