From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christian Zoffoli Subject: Re: Performance numbers on PV-on-HVM Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 20:56:08 +0200 Message-ID: <4CA4DD48.4030704@xmerlin.org> References: <4CA2698B.5010901@xmerlin.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com Cc: Stefano Stabellini List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Il 29/09/2010 11:10, Stefano Stabellini ha scritto: [cut] > Yes, you are right. > A little while back I backported the whole series to 2.6.32 and the > result was included the Jeremy's pvops main branch, but I haven't kept > it completely up to date. > The new changes that are only in the 2.6.35-rc5-pvhvm-v7 branch regards > PV spinlocks, the balloon driver and the PV console. that's a good news but in my experience the pv_ops kernel is not as stable as the suse xenified kernel ...imho the best would be to have clean patches for a 3.6.32.x vanilla kernel ...so we can do packages close to the official ones ...with only this great addition. Best regards, Christian