From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yinghai Lu Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xen tree with the tip tree Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 21:03:19 -0700 Message-ID: <4CC10D07.6000303@kernel.org> References: <20101022140335.c4a3a48f.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20101022143607.132d381c.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20101022143607.132d381c.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Xen Devel , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Gianluca Guida , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 10/21/2010 08:36 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Jeremy, > > On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 14:03:35 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> >> Today's linux-next merge of the xen tree got a conflict in >> arch/x86/mm/init_32.c between commit >> 1d931264af0f10649b35afa8fbd2e169da51ac08 ("x86-32, memblock: Make >> add_highpages honor early reserved ranges") from the tip tree and commit >> 07147a06ac3b1b028124ea00ba44e69eb8ea7685 ("x86/32: honor reservations of >> high memory") from the xen tree. >> >> I have no idea how to fix this up, sorry, so I have used the xen tree >> from next-20101021 for today. > x86-32, memblock: Make add_highpages honor early reserved ranges is updated version with memblock for x86/32: honor reservations of high memory Assume Jeremy would update the xen tree. Thanks Yinghai